期刊文献+

权力对认知的影响:启发式还是分析式? 被引量:5

The Effect of Power on Cognition: Heuristic or Analytic?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 权力对信息加工方式的影响成为权力领域研究的新焦点。一般认为,权力使得个体减少对他人和环境的依赖,进而引发简单化的信息加工取向,高权力者常因认知懒惰而采用启发式信息加工策略,然而这与现实情境中高权力者面对复杂的决策环境、做出较好的决策结果的情况不符。事实上,权力既可能产生启发式认知也可能产生分析式认知,但都更受情境的影响。文章从双系统模型的视角对信息加工过程中权力效应的研究进行梳理,并探讨了权力引发不同信息加工方式的调节变量。最后,文章从权力对认知影响的内在机制、角色分配、权力动态变化对认知影响等方面,讨论了现有现有研究的不足,并分析探讨了该领域今后的研究趋势。 Recently, many intriguing studies of power in the perspective of social cognition had been proposed. It was generally acknowledged that power induced a simplified processing orientation that focused on single sources of information and that high power individuals always adopted heuristic strategy for information processing because of cognitive laziness. However, this was inconsistent with the fact that high power individuals were always faced with a complex decision environment and made good decisions. Actually, the effect of power on heuristic versus analytic cognition depended on the primary factors that was triggered by the situation. This paper made a review of the studies about the effect of power on information processing style from the perspective of dual- system model. Then, we put forward that the relationship between power and information processing style was mediated by other factors. Finally, the future research tendencies, including the mechanism of the effect of power on cognition, the principles of assigning roles and the effect of dynamic changes of power on cognition were discussed.
机构地区 苏州大学心理系
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期446-453,共8页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 权力 双系统模型 合法性 稳定性 power, dual - system model, legitimacy, stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:143
  • 2尚玉钒,富萍萍,荘珮雯.权力来源的第三个维度——“关系权力”的实证研究[J].管理学家(学术版),2011(1):3-11. 被引量:9
  • 3韦庆旺,俞国良.权力的社会认知研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(6):1336-1343. 被引量:56
  • 4Anderson, C. , & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362 - 1377.
  • 5Anderson, C. , & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk - taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511 - 536.
  • 6Brinol, P. , Petty, R. E. , Valle, C. , Rucker, D. D. , & Becerra, A. (2007 ). The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self - validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1040 - 1053.
  • 7Chen, S. , & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic - systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds. ), Dual - process theories in social psychology (pp. 73 - 96). New York: Guilford Press.
  • 8Chen, S. , Langner, C. A. , & Mendoza - Denton, R. ( 2009 ). When dispositional and role power fit: Implications for self - expression and self - other congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3),710 -727.
  • 9Cote, S. , Kraus, M. W. , Cheng, B. H. , Oveis, C. , Van der Lowe, I. , Lian, H. , & Keltner, D. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101,217 -232.
  • 10DeDreu,C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 303 -319.

二级参考文献95

  • 1韦庆旺.(2008).权力差异和社会动机对谈判行为和结果的影响.博士学位论文.浙江大学.
  • 2Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
  • 3Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
  • 4Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462--479.
  • 5Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
  • 6Berdahl, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497-509.
  • 7Carver, C. S., Sutton, $. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
  • 8Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187.
  • 9Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
  • 10Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory Control: A generative force behind power's far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502-508.

共引文献205

同被引文献69

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部