期刊文献+

国产与进口含HFA-134A抛射剂的硫酸沙丁胺醇气雾剂对哮喘肺功能影响的比较 被引量:3

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhalers with HFA-134A propellant
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价国产应用HFA-134A抛射剂的硫酸沙丁胺醇定量吸入气雾剂的药效学特征及安全性。方法:采用随机、双盲、阳性药物平行对照试验设计,以进口含HFA-134A抛射剂的硫酸沙丁胺醇定量吸入气雾剂为对照,试验组及予单次吸入国产硫酸沙丁胺醇气雾剂,对照组单次吸入进口硫酸沙丁胺醇气雾剂,给药后不同时间点作肺功能检查。结果:两组给药后5,15,30min及1,2,4,6hFEV,较给药前均有改善,FEV。改善率曲线下面积(AFEV,%-AUC0-6h),组间比较差异无统计学意义;两组起效时间、药效维持时间、FEV,改善率平均值及最大值、FVC改善率平均值及最大值、PEF改善率平均值及最大值等药效学指标比较,差异均无统计学意义。两组均表现出较好的安全性且不良反应率无统计学差异。结论:国产应用HFA-134A抛射剂的硫酸沙丁胺醇定量吸入气雾剂药效学与参比进口制剂相当且安全性较好。 Objective: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic property and safety of domestic salbutamol sulfate MDI with HFA-134A in asthmatic patients. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, positive controlled clinical tri- al was conducted in asthmatic patients. They were randomized to inhale single dose of 200 μg domestic salbutamol sulfate MDI or same dose of imported salbutamol sulfate MDI. Lung function tests were conducted pre-doing and at 5, 15, 30 minutes and I, 2, 4, 6 hours post-dosing. Results: Totally 54 patients were enrolled into the trial. Both drugs showed equivalent time-dependent bronchodilator responses as measured by area under curve over 6 hours of percentage change in FEV1. Other pharmacodynamic parameters including time to onset of action, duration of bron- chodilation response, mean and maximum change rate of FEV1 , FVC and PEF values were similar between the two groups. Both drugs were well tolerated, with no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion: The tested domestic salbutamol sulfate HFA-134A MDI produced similar bronchodila- tion response and safety as the imported product.
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期682-685,共4页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
关键词 抛射剂替代 硫酸沙丁胺醇 定量吸入气雾剂 支气管哮喘 药效学 propellant replacement salbutamol sulfate metered dose inhaler (MDI) asthma pharmacody- namic
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) , National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes for Heath. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention [ C ]. Bethesda: National In- stitutes of Heahh Conference, 2011.
  • 2D'SOUZA S. The Montreal protocol and essential use exemptions [J]. J Aerosol Med, 1995:8 (Suppl 1): s13-s17.
  • 3周新.定量吸入气雾剂的研究进展[J].世界临床药物,2012,33(11):697-699. 被引量:6
  • 4王平,陈桂良.我国药用气雾剂CFC替代的现状和思考[J].中国医药工业杂志,2008,39(11):860-865. 被引量:9
  • 5金方,王彦.我国吸入气雾剂用氟里昂替代的研究现状和挑战[J].上海医药,2009,30(4):156-159. 被引量:7
  • 6HUGHES DA, WOODCOCK A, WALLEY T. Review of thera- peutically equivalent alternatives to short acting 132 adrenoceptor agonists delivered via chlorofluorocarbon-containing inhalers [ J ]. Thorax, 1999,54(12) :1087 - 1092.
  • 7LEACH CL. The CFC to HFA trasition and its impact on pulmo- nary drug development[J]. Respir Care, 2005, 50 ( 9 ) : 1201 - 1208.
  • 8LANGLEY SJ, SYKES AP, BATTY EP, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of single doses of HFA 134a albuterol and CFC albuterol in mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients [ J ]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2002,88 (5) : 488 - 493.
  • 9JANTIKAR A, BRASHIER B, MAGANJI M, et al. Comparison of bronchodilator responses of levosalbutamol and salbutamol giv- en via a pressurized metered dose inhaler: A randomized, double blind, single-dose, crossover study[ J]. Respir Med, 2007, 101 (4) : 845 -849.
  • 10BOUSQUET J, HUCHON G, LECLERC V,et al. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose, efficacy crossover tri- al comparing Formoterol-HFA (pMDI) versus Formoterol-DPI (Aerolizer^TM ) and placebo ( pMDI or Aerolizer^TM ) in asthmatic patients[ J]. Respiration,2005,72( Suppl 1 ) : 6 - 12.

二级参考文献32

共引文献17

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部