国际法准则与“保护的责任”——兼论西方对利比亚和叙利亚的干预

The Rule of International Law and the Analysis on "Responsibility to Protect" ——Also on the Western Intervention in Libya and Syria

目前,国际法中"保护的责任"是法律、政治和道德的综合体,但是尚不构成国际法的正式渊源。"保护的责任"不能违背不干涉内政和禁止使用武力原则,联合国框架是其唯一合法且不可回避的决策协调机制。从利比亚到叙利亚,中、俄等国与西方国家在"保护的责任"上采取了截然不同的态度,现实中的多个因素决定了"保护的责任"在两国实践的不同。基于目前"保护的责任"发展现状,中国宜以积极举措应对"保护的责任"理论与实践的新发展,倡导以和平方式化解各类冲突。

At present, ＂responsibility to protect＂ in international law is a complex concept of law, politics, and morality, though it has not been a formal source of international law. ＂Responsibility to protect＂ can＇t break the principle of not to interfere in other countries＇ internal affairs and the ban on the use of force. The U. N. framework is the only legal and unavoidable decision-making coordination mechanism. The deadlock of the U. N. Security Council is the primary problem to execute ＂responsibility to protect＂ . From Libya to Syria, China, Russia and other countries take different attitudes on the ＂responsibility to protect＂, while the multiple real factors determine the ＂responsibility to protect＂ having different results in the two countries. Based on the current development of ＂responsibility to protect＂, China should take positive measures dealing with this theory and the new developments in its practice, and advocate peaceful resolutions to conflicts of various kinds.