摘要
本文对中国和西方传统历史分期方法中的"人"进行了整理,指出其无法代表现实而全面的人类群体,无法真实地体现人的一般本质,在研究历史发展的根本动力方面存在缺失。马克思历史分期理论的重要意义,就在于以唯物史观为基础来揭示人在历史中的主体作用,即通过创造性实践活动来推动历史发展。在当代,这种主体作用更多地体现为"创和"实践。
This article collated the definitions of ＂human＂ in the traditional historical division methods of China and the West. They couldn＇t represent the essence of human being and thus failed to reflect the fundamental driving force of history. Based on historical materialism, Marx＇s historical division theory revealed the principal role of human, i.e. driving history by creative practice. At the present times, the principal role of human mainly lies in ＂harmony - creation＂ practice.
出处
《学术探索》
CSSCI
2014年第4期9-12,共4页
Academic Exploration
关键词
马克思
历史分期理论
主体作用
“创和”实践
the historical division theory
the subject role
＂harmony -creation＂ practice
