优质护理和常规护理在急性心肌梗死患者护理中的效果对比观察

Effect observation of quality nursing and conventional nursing in patients with acute myocardial infarction

目的探讨优质护理和常规护理在急性心肌梗死患者护理中的效果及临床价值。方法将186例急性心肌梗死患者随机分观察组和对照组各93例,对照组使用常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上同时接受优质护理,比较2组患者的卧床时间、住院时间、医疗费用、疾病知识掌握程度、护理满意度及并发症发生率。结果观察组患者在卧床时间、住院天数、医疗费用、疾病知识掌握程度、护理满意度及并发症发生率方面均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与常规护理相比,优质护理可缩短患者卧床时间和住院天数,降低医疗费用和并发症发生率,提高了护理满意度,丰富了患者的疾病知识,值得在基层医院大力推广应用。

Objective To explore the clinical value and effect of quality nursing and con- ventional nursing on patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 186 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into observation group and control group, the 93 patients in the control group were used conventional nursing while the patients in the obser- vation group was conducted quality nursing on the basis of conventional nursing. Bed time, hospi- talization time, medical expenses, mastery of knowledge of diseases, nursing satisfaction and com- plication rates were compared in the two groups. Results The bed time, hospitalization time, medical expenses, disease knowledge levels, nursing satisfaction and complications rate in the ob- servation group were higher than that in the control group. The results revealed that the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Compared with conventional nursing, quality nursing could shorten bed time of patients and hospitalization time, reduce medical costs and the in- cidence of complications, improve nursing satisfaction and enrich the knowledge of the patient＇s disease, so it is worthy of popularization in community- level hospitals.