期刊文献+

证据法的运行机制与社会控制功能

Operational Mechanism and Social Control Function of Evidence Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国诸多社会失范现象有着复杂的成因,这要求法律制度必须作出必要的回应。但目前我国证据制度中的规则缺位,不仅导致其难以很好地回应某些社会失范现象,甚至还加剧了事态的严重性。作为规制司法审判事实认定过程的证据法,应当具备促进事实真相发现和维护社会普遍价值的双重功能。正是在求真与求善的价值权衡过程中,证据法对于解决中国的某些社会失范现象将有所助力。因为通过证据筛选、举证激励、行为制裁、动机保护和证据裁定救济等运行机制,证据法能够发挥降低错案风险、抑制司法腐败和保障被追诉者人权等直接社会控制功能,以及保护社会关系和增进社会福利等间接社会控制功能。因此,我们必须认真对待证据法。 Many kinds of social anomie in China have some complex reasons, which require law system giving neces-sary response. However, the absence of some evidence rules in Chinese current evidence system resulted in that law sys-tem cannot well response these social anomies, and even made the situation becoming more serious. Evidence Law, as the legal norm regulating fact-finding in the trial, has two functions: one is promoting the discovery of truth, and the other is maintaining some social common values. In the weighing process of seeking truth and seeking goods, evidence law is help-ful to solve some social anomies. Through the evidence filter mechanism, evidence incentive mechanism, behavior sanction mechanism, motivation protection mechanism and evidence verdict relief mechanism, evidence law can play the directly so-cial control function of reducing the risk of misjudged cases, curbing judicial corruption and guaranteeing the human rights of the accused, and the indirect social control function of protecting social relations and improving social welfare. There-fore, we should take evidence law seriously.
作者 郑飞
出处 《南通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第1期31-40,共10页 Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
基金 北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师人文社科项目(20121005301)
关键词 社会失范 证据法 运行机制 社会控制功能 social anomie evidence law operation mechanism social control function
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1张保生.证据制度建设是司法改革首要任务[J].中国改革,2011(9):49-52. 被引量:3
  • 2向楠.76-3%受访者承认小悦悦的死让自己反思[N].中国青年报,2011-10-27,第7版.
  • 3James Bradley Thayer. A Preliminary Treatise on Evi-dence at the Common Law, Boston: Little Brown, 1898. From Peter Murphy, Evidence, Proof, and Facts, Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • 4[美]米尔建·R.达马斯卡.漂移的证据法[M].李学军,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003.
  • 5罗纳德·J·艾伦,郑飞(译),强卉(译),张保生(校).排除规则的困难[J].证据科学,2012,20(6):750-768. 被引量:5
  • 6Alex Stein, Constitutional Evidence Law. Vanderbih Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008.
  • 7张保生.证据规则的价值基础和理论体系[J].法学研究,2008,30(2):122-132. 被引量:47
  • 8John Henry Wigmore. Evidence 2285. John T. Mc- Naughton rev. 1961.
  • 9Lisa Dufraimont, Evidence Law and the Jury: A Re- assessment (2008), 53 McGill L.J. 199.
  • 10John Henry Wigmore, Evidence in TriMs at Common Law, revised by Peter Tillers, Vol. IV, Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1983.

二级参考文献22

共引文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部