期刊文献+

科学写作:科学教育之有效路径 被引量:4

Science Writing:An Effective Approach to Science Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学写作可以帮助教师了解学生原有的科学知识经验,引发认知过程、提高认知效率,促进前概念向科学概念发展,提升科学推理能力,是科学教育的有效路径。科学写作过程由计划、转换和检查构成,具有循环、交互性。任务环境和作者的长时记忆对科学写作亦有影响。在实际教学中,教师可以根据科学写作的内在认知过程及外在影响因素予以针对性指导。 Science writing can help teachers learn about the scientific knowledge and experience students already have in mind . It can also trigger the process of cognition , improve the efficiency of students'cognition , facilitate the development of the pre-scientific concepts into scientific concept , and enhance scientific reasoning . Hence , science writing is an effective approach to science educaiton .Science writing is a cyclic and interactive process which consists of planning , transformation , and reviewing . Task environment and writer's long-term memory are the factors affecting science writing . In teaching science writing , teachers should provide pertinent guidance to students in accordance with the internal cogintive process of science writing and the externalinfluencing factors .
作者 汪明 李洁
出处 《当代教育与文化》 CSSCI 2014年第2期89-92,共4页 Contemporary Education and Culture
基金 国家科技部重大基础专项课题"中小学科学探究学习与创新人才培养机制实验研究"(2009IM010300) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"教学伦理学研究"(12JJD880013)阶段性研究成果
关键词 科学写作 科学教育 科学概念 科学推理 写作过程 science writing science education scientific concept scientific reasoning writing process
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Keys, C. W. The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six ninth-grade students [-J. Journal of Research in Science Education, 1994, 31 (9): 1003-1022.
  • 2Langer, J. A. b- Applebee, A. How Writing Shapes Thinking: a Study of Teaching and Learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1986.
  • 3Flavell J H. Cognitive monitoring. In. Dickson W P (Ed.). Children's Oral Communication Skill [M. New York: Academic Press, 1981. 232.
  • 4Posner, G. J. , Strike, K. A. , Hewson, P. W. g> Gertzog, W. A. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change [J]. Science Education, 1982, 66 (2): 211-227.
  • 5Fellows, N. J. A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning [J]. Journal of Research in Science Education, 1994, 31 (9). 985-1001.
  • 6李平,李大超.基于模型推理的科学认知论题[J].哲学研究,2005(10):65-72. 被引量:5
  • 7David L. Grey, The writing process, Wadwvrth Publishing Company, Inc. , 1972: 11.
  • 8John R. Hayes, Linda S. Flower, 'Identifying the organization of writing processes', Cognitive processes in writing, edited by Lee W. Gergg, Erwin R. Steinberg, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1980: 29.

二级参考文献25

  • 1Barsalou, L, 1992, Cognitive Psychology. An Overview for Cognitive Scientists, Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • 2Brewer, W. F, 1999,"Scientific theories and naive theories as forms of mental representation: Psychologism revived", Science and Education, 8,489-505.
  • 3Brewer, W. F,2003, "Mental models", in L. Nadel(ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Vol.3, 1 - 6, London: Nature Publishing Group.
  • 4Brewer, W. F, Chinn, C. A. & Samarapungavan, A, 1998,"Explanation in scientists and children", Minds and Machines, 8, 119-136.
  • 5Carruthers, P, Stich, S. & Siegal, M.(eds.),2002, The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Gentner, D. & Stevens, A. L.(eds.), 1983, Mental Models, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 7Giere, R. N. (ed.), 1992, Cognitive Models of Science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume XV. Minneapolis, M N: University of Minnesota Press.
  • 8Giere, R. N. (ed.), 1999 ,Science without Laws, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Gorman, M. E, Tweney, R. D, Gooding, D. C. & Kincannon, A. (eds.),2005 ,Scientific and Technological Tthinking, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 10Johnson-Laird, P. N,1980, "Mental models in cognitive science", Cognitive Sciences, 4, 71-115.

共引文献4

同被引文献35

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部