期刊文献+

Ethics and Law: Reassessment on the Legal Positivism

Ethics and Law: Reassessment on the Legal Positivism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Legal system in a modern society is administered by judiciary which is due to separation of powers in a constitutional government whose role is congruent with market-based (i.e., capitalist) social formation. At the outset of modernity, an overall morality, as a social system, lacked for ordering all social relations in modern society under overdetermination of market relationships and class differentiation. Despite the fact that we may attribute moral property to the patterned relationship, there is somewhat a common character between morals and laws that both of them visibly set forth by reciprocity between individuals and social groups, which are backed by external sanctions as manifested with notion of justice, as evaluative criterion of impartiality. Thereby, the other problem is a tiny relationship or sometimes tension between social systems of morals and individual ethical virtues; even though some philosophers are willing to equate virtues, morals, and the law as squarely reducing virtues to obey the established law. As though, legal system and some morals incidentally coincide, the law cannot be evenly rely on morality in spite of presumed legitimacy by means of morals that have been overall subject matter of philosophy of law. Regarding the social structure of any capitalist society, I frankly say that law autonomously or semi-autonomously arose as a discrete depolitical power system other than system of morals which was ultimately determined by mode of production. Therefore, it relies on a convention-like social approbation, whatsoever is stably or unstably balanced with political power.
机构地区 Istanbul University
出处 《Journal of Philosophy Study》 2014年第2期75-96,共22页 哲学研究(英文版)
关键词 LAW MORALITY ETHICS legal positivism depolitical 法律体系 社会形态 伦理 资本主义 社会制度 动力系统 社会关系 社会群体
  • 相关文献

参考文献59

  • 1Aquinas, St. Thomas. Political Writings. Ed. and Trans. R. W. Dyson. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press, 2002.
  • 2Assmann, Jan. Das kulturelle Gedgichtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische ldentitgit in friihen Hochkulturen. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1992. (Turkish translation: Jan Assman. Kultfirel Bellek, Eski Yfiksek Kiiltiirlerde Yazt, Hatlrlama ve Politik Kimlik. Trans. Aye Tekin. Istanbul: Ayrmtl, 2001.).
  • 3Austin, J. L. How To Do Things With Words. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
  • 4Austin, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Ed. Robert Campbell. London: John Murray, 1873.
  • 5Ayer, A. J. Language, Truth andLogic. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.
  • 6Beaumanoir, Philippe de. Cotumes de Beauvaisis. Ed. Am Salmon. Paris: Alphonse Pichard et Fils, 1899.
  • 7Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.
  • 8Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1991.
  • 9Christie, George C. "On the Moral Obligation to Obey the Law." Duke Law Journal 6 (1990): 1311-36.
  • 10Cicero. On Moral Ends. Trans. Raphael Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部