期刊文献+

“保护的责任”的运用及扩散——以规范的发展过程为中心 被引量:1

Exploring “Responsibility to Protect”and Its Diffusion in International Society——Focusing on the Diffusion Process of Norm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当今国际社会从未停止过对人权和主权之间张力的反思,"保护的责任"这一概念应运而生。这一尚待完善的概念得到了国际社会和国际法以及国际关系学者的关注和讨论。以国际关系规范理论为基础,可以分析"保护的责任"这一概念的产生和发展成为国际社会一个新规范的过程。本文以中国为例,考察了"保护的责任"在中国扩散的原因以及中国如何灵活地处理这一规范与"不干涉主义"之间产生的张力。由此分析可得,国际规范的创制和扩散是国际社会与个别国家之间互动的结果,而在这一过程中国家本身对规范背后的价值认可至关重要。 Scholars and politicians have never stopped considering the tension between sovereignty and human right in contemporary international society. The concept of "Responsibility to Protect" attracts a great attention and has been discussed by academia of international law and international relations. Based on the norm theory of international relations, this paper analyzed the process how this concept has been born and has become a new norm in international society. Through the China's case, this paper elaborates the reason why this concept has diffused in China and discusses that China deals flexibly with the tension between the concept of "Responsibility to Protect" and "non-intervention principle". The conclusion is that the creation and diffusion of international norms is the consequence of the interaction between international society and an individual country. In this process of the birth of a new norm, it is critically important that individual country recognizes the value underlying the international norm.
作者 任慕
机构地区 日本立命馆大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 2014年第2期34-41,共8页 Pacific Journal
关键词 保护的责任 规范 人道主义干涉 不干涉原则 中国 Responsibility to Protect norm humanitarian intervention non-intervention principle China
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1A. P. V. Rogers, "Humanitarian Intervention and International Law" Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2004 pp. 725 - 736.
  • 2Justin Colon, "Sovereign- ty vs. Human Rights or Sovereignty and Human Rights?", Race and Class, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2004, p. 76.
  • 3R. H, Jackson, " Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life", Journal of International Studies, Vol. 19 ,No. 2, 1990.
  • 4A. P. V. Rogers, "Humanitarian Interven- tion and International Law", Harvard Journal of Law and Public Poli- cy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2004, pp. 725 -736.
  • 5Alex Bellamy, "Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and 2005 World Summit", Ethic and International Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2006, pp. 143 - 169.
  • 6M. Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, Alien Lane, 1978, p. 108.
  • 7Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 285 - 290.
  • 8邱美荣,周清.“保护的责任”:冷战后西方人道主义介入的理论研究[J].欧洲研究,2012,30(2):122-138. 被引量:10
  • 9Thomas Risse, " Let's Arguel Communicative Action in World Politics", International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1 - 39.
  • 10[英]尼古拉斯·惠勒著,张德生译.《拯救陌生人——国际社会中的人道主义干涉》,中央编译出版社,2011年版,第11页.

二级参考文献172

共引文献62

同被引文献26

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部