期刊文献+

碘伏棉球放置时机在预防经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术后感染中的作用 被引量:8

Impact of insertion timing of iodophor cotton ball on the control of infection complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨碘伏棉球的放置时机在预防经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下前列腺活检术后感染中的作用.方法 将2012年3月至2013年1月行TRUS引导下前列腺活检术的197例患者,数字随机分为碘伏棉球后放组66例、前放组66例、前放+后放组65例,前瞻性研究3组患者活检术后感染相关症状、体征及实验室检查,分析不同时机直肠内放置碘伏棉球对控制术后感染发生率的影响.结果 后放组中6例发生感染,前放组及前放+后放组中各有2例患者发生感染,3组患者感染发生率分别为9.09%(6/66)、3.03%(2/66)、3.08%(2/65).后放组与前放组及前放+后放组间感染发生率差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),前放组与前放+后放组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 经TRUS引导下前列腺活检术中,在置入腔内超声探头前于直肠内放入碘伏棉球可在一定程度上预防感染的发生,降低感染发生率. Objective To explore the impact of insertion timing of iodophor cotton ball on the control of infection complications after transreetal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. Methods A total of 197 patients undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy from March 2012 to January 2013 were randomly divided into post-discharge, pre-discharge and pre-discharge plus post-discharge groups. A prospective study was made on the symptoms of infections, signs and relevant laboratory examinations in all three groups. Results Infections occurred in 6/66 patients in the post-discharge group and 2 patients in the other two groups. The prevalence rates were 7. 58%, 3. 08% and 3.03% respectively. Statistically significant difference existed in the prevalence rate between pre-discharge and post-discharge groups (P 〈 0. 05). Yet no statistically significant difference existed between pre-discharge and pre-discharge plus post- discharge groups (P 〉 O. 05 ). Conclusion During the TRUS guided prostate biopsy, inserting an iodophor cotton ball before placing an ultrasonic probento the rectum can control the infection and reduce its prevalence rate.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期609-611,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 超声检查 前列腺肿瘤 活组织检查 感染 Uhrasonography Prostatic neoplasms Biopsy Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献63

  • 1严维刚,李汉忠,周毅,纪志刚,张慧,肖雨,刘彤华.超声引导下经会阴定位模板的前列腺饱和穿刺活检[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(6):400-403. 被引量:14
  • 2Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal ultra-sound. Curt Opin Uml, 2000, 10: 111-116.
  • 3Enlund AL, Varenhorst E. Morbidity of ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic therapy, a prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol, 1997, 79:777-780.
  • 4Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal ultra-sound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol, 1998, 160:2115-2120.
  • 5Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et aL Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17:1-12.
  • 6Melekos MD. Efficacy of prophylactic antimierobial regimens in preventing infectious complications after transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol, 1990, 22: 257-262.
  • 7Fong IW, Struthers N, Honey R J, et al. A randomized comparative study of the prophylactic use of trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole versus netilmycin-metronidazole in transrectal prostatic biopsy. J Urol, 1991, 146: 794-797.
  • 8Brewster SF, MacGowan AP, Gingell JC. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal prostatic biopsy : a prospective randomized trial of cefuroxime versus piperacillin/tazobactam. Br J Urol, 1995, 76:351-354.
  • 9Aus G, Ahlgren G, Bergdahl S, et al. Infection after transrectal core biopsies of the prostate-risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Br J Urol, 1996, 77 :851-855.
  • 10Kapoor DA, Klimberg IW, Malek GI-I, et al. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy. Urol, 1998, 52:552-558.

共引文献27

同被引文献72

  • 1范海涛,王尧,王凯臣,王伟华,计国义,高洪文,潘淑琴,孔祥波,赵学俭,桑原正明.经直肠B超引导下前列腺穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用价值(附658例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(6):435-437. 被引量:17
  • 2胡望平,冯福英,叶桂云,肖少林,章宏斌,王海林,郑苗.血清c-PSA及C/T在提高前列腺癌诊断特异性中的探讨[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(18):1815-1817. 被引量:7
  • 3Cantiello F,Cicione A,Autorino R,et al.Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography,transrectal ultrasonography and retrograde cystography for the detection of vesicourethral anastomosis leakage after radical retropubic prostatectomy:a prospective comparative evaluation.Urol Int,2012,90(3):316-320.
  • 4Cerruto MA,Vianello F,D’’Elia C,et al.Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer:a comparative evaluation at the same institution〔J〕. Archivio Italiano di Urologia Andrologia . 2014
  • 5P Emiliozzi,A Corsetti,B Tassi,G Federico,M Martini,V Pansadoro.??Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy(J)Urology . 2003 (5)
  • 6Boris Gershman,Anthony L. Zietman,Adam S. Feldman,W. Scott McDougal.??Transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for patients with persistently elevated PSA and multiple prior negative biopsies(J)Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations . 2012
  • 7Stacy Loeb,Annelies Vellekoop,Hashim U. Ahmed,James Catto,Mark Emberton,Robert Nam,Derek J. Rosario,Vincenzo Scattoni,Yair Lotan.??Systematic Review of Complications of Prostate Biopsy(J)European Urology . 2013
  • 8Brullet E, Guevara MC, Campo R, et al. Massive rectal bleeding following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopy[ J l.Endoscopy. 2000,32 ( 10 ) : 792-795.
  • 9Lindert KA, Kabalin JN ,Terris MK, Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy [ J ].J Urol, 2000, 164 ( 1 ) : 76-80.
  • 10Rodriguez l,V,Terris MK.Risks and complications of transreetal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.Aprospeetive study anti re'clew of the literatureIJl.J Urol 1998,160(6 ptl ) :2115-2120.

引证文献8

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部