期刊文献+

A Rapid Assessment of Scleractinian and Non-Scleractinian Coral Growth Forms Along the Saudi Arabian Coast, Red Sea

A Rapid Assessment of Scleractinian and Non-Scleractinian Coral Growth Forms Along the Saudi Arabian Coast, Red Sea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this study we assessed the current status of coral reefs along the Saudi Arabian coast of the Red Sea. Among the three growth forms of Acroporid corals, the branching forms were found to dominate in the Farassan Islands(44.55%±11.10% cover) followed by tabular forms in the Doga Islands(ranging between 18%±6.47% and 18.30%±9.47% cover). Digitate forms were rarely found along the coast except at Maqna. Among the five growth forms of non-Acroporid corals, we observed maximum cover of branching forms in the Yanbu offshore area(58.89%±15.11% cover) followed by the Jeddah coast(24.76%±14.04% cover). The Millepora spp., a non-Scleractinian coral, was abundant at all the near-shore sites, such as Jeddah(10.70%±8.21%) and Al-Wajh(9.81%±6.69%). The live coral cover(including both Scleractinian and non-Scleractinian corals) of Saudi Red Sea coast was seen to be higher in the north and gradually decrease towards the south. Principal Component analysis showed that the contribution of Acroporid corals was greater in the southern region than in the northern and middle regions, but vice-versa in the case of non-Acroporid corals. Bray-Curtis cluster analysis categorized all the study sites into two major clusters with 60% similarity. Among them, one cluster-forming sites from Maqna to Masturah(Northern region) and the second one comprised the middle and southern regions(Jeddah to Farassan Islands), and one outlier Rabigh. In this study we assessed the current status of coral reefs along the Saudi Arabian coast of the Red Sea. Among the three growth forms of Acroporid corals, the branching forms were found to dominate in the Farassan Islands (44.55%±11.10% cover) fol-lowed by tabular forms in the Doga Islands (ranging between 18%±6.47% and 18.30%±9.47% cover). Digitate forms were rarely found along the coast except at Maqna. Among the five growth forms of non-Acroporid corals, we observed maximum cover of branching forms in the Yanbu offshore area (58.89%±15.11% cover) followed by the Jeddah coast (24.76%±14.04% cover). The Millepora spp., a non-Scleractinian coral, was abundant at all the near-shore sites, such as Jeddah (10.70%±8.21%) and A1-Wajh (9.81%±6.69%). The live coral cover (including both Scleractinian and non-Scleractinian corals) of Saudi Red Sea coast was seen to be higher in the north and gradually decrease towards the south. Principal Component analysis showed that the contribution of Acro- porid corals was greater in the southern region than in the northem and middle regions, but vice-versa in the case of non-Acroporid corals. Bray-Curtis cluster analysis categorized all the study sites into two major clusters with 60% similarity. Among them, one cluster-forming sites from Maqna to Masturah (Northem region) and the second one comprised the middle and southem regions (Jeddah to Farassan Islands), and one outlier Rabigh.
出处 《Journal of Ocean University of China》 SCIE CAS 2014年第2期243-248,共6页 中国海洋大学学报(英文版)
关键词 造礁石珊瑚 沙特阿拉伯 快速评估 海岸 生长形态 红海 最大覆盖 主成分分析 coral reef growth forms Saudi Arabia coral diversity scleractinian coral Red Sea
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1A1-Saafani, M. A., and Shenoi, S. S. C., 2004. Seasonal cycle of hydrography in the Bab el Mandab region, Southern Red Sea. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Science (Earth Planet. Sci.), 113 (3): 269-280.
  • 2A1-Sofyani, A. A., 2000. Bleaching of some Red Sea corals at Obhour Bay, Jeddah. International Symposium on the Extent of Coral Reef Bleaching. Riyadh, 18pp.
  • 3Ammar, M. S. A., Ghobashi, A. A., Omran, M. A., and Shaa- ban, A. M., 2007. Status of coral reef affected by different impacts in some sites of the Red Sea. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 33 (1): 224-237.
  • 4ARMDES, 1996. AIMS Reef Monitoring Data Entry System; version 1.6, Long term reef monitoring project. Australian In- stitute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia, 12-34.
  • 5Arthur, R., 2000. Coral bleaching and mortality in three Indian reef regions during an E1 Nifio Southern Oscillation event. Current Science, 79 (12): 1723-1728.
  • 6Baird, A. H., and Marshall, P. A., 1998. Mass bleaching of cor- als of Great Barrier Reefs. Coral Reefs, 17: 376.
  • 7Celliers. L., and Schleyer, H. M., 2002. Coral bleaching on high- latitude marginal reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44: 1380-1387. D.
  • 8icks, B., 1984. Oil pollution in the Red Sea - Environmental monitoring of an oilfield in a coral area, Gulf of Suez. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 31 (6-8): 833-854.
  • 9Edward, J. K. P., Kulkarni, S., Jayabaskaran, R., Lazarus, S., Mary, A., Venkataraman, K., Das, S. P., Tamelander, J., Ra- jasuriya, A., Jayakumar, K., Kumaraguru, A. K., Marimuthu, N., Sluka, R., and Wilson, J. J., 2006.
  • 10The effects of the 2004 Tsunami on mainland India and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In: Status of Coral Reefs in Tsunami Affected Coun- tries: 2005. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, Austra- lian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia, 154pp.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部