期刊文献+

汉日情态共现的差异与共性 被引量:6

Similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese modal co-occurrence patterns
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探讨汉语和日语情态共现的差异与共性。从共现类型、共现项数、句子结构、共现规则、共现语义的角度对汉日情态共现进行对比研究后发现,汉语和日语的情态标志连续共现呈现出截然相反的排列顺序。从类型学的角度对汉日情态共现进行观察可以得知,汉日情态标志共现顺序相反现象背后隐藏着某些人类语言共同的规律:汉日的情态连续共现都遵循情态的语法化链顺序,主观性弱的情态类型离V(VP)近,主观性强的情态类型距离V(VP)远。在共现语义方面,汉日具有的相似情形是,共现的情态动词之间相互作用完成整体语义的构建,一个句子一般凸显一种情态语义。 The paper discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese modal cooccurrence patterns.Based on a Japanese-Chinese contrastive research on the type,number of items,sentence structure and semantics of modal co-occurrence,we find that the co-occurrence patterns of Japanese and Chinese modals exhibit the reverse order.However,some common rules of human language can be found behind the different surfaces from the typological perspective:both Chinese and Japanese consecutive modal co-occurrence follow the grammaticalization chain of modality:with weak subjective modality closer to the verb(VP),whereas relatively strong subjective modality farther away from the verb(VP).In terms of semantics of the co-occurrence,Chinese and Japanese have something in common:the overall meaning is constructed by the interaction between the co-occurring modal markers,with one modal meaning more prominent.
作者 王晓华
机构地区 上海外国语大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期202-213,319-320,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 上海外国语大学2013年度校级一般科研项目"基于语言类型学的现代日汉情态对比研究"(2013114021) 上海外国语大学青年教师科研创新团队项目"基于日语学习者语料库的二语习得研究"(QJTD11MWW01 主持人毛文伟) 2011年度江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目"认知视角下的日语名词性助动词的意义结构及习得研究"(2011SJD740022 主持人陈林俊)的阶段性成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [M]. Am- sterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 2Bybee J., R. Perkins &W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 3Greenberg, J. 1963/1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements [A]. In J. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language (24edition) [C]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. 73-113.
  • 4Guo, J. 1994. Social Interaction, Meaning and Grammatical Form: Children's Development and Use of Modal Auxiliaries in Mandarin Chinese [D]. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
  • 5Haiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation [J]. Language 59: 781-819.
  • 6Haspelmath, M. 2003. Meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison I-A]. In M. Tomasello (ed.). The New Psychology of Language, Vol. II [C]. London: Psychology Press. 211-240.
  • 7Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 8金立鑫,于秀金.从与OV-VO相关和不相关参项考察普通话的语序类型[J].外国语,2012,35(2):22-29. 被引量:49
  • 9马庆株.能愿动词的连用[J].语言研究,1988,8(1):18-28. 被引量:65
  • 10桥本万太郎.1977/2008,余志鸿译,《语言地理类型学))[M].北京:世界图书出版公司.

二级参考文献14

  • 1金立鑫.关于疑问句中的“呢”[J].语言教学与研究,1996(4):43-49. 被引量:35
  • 2Dryer, M. S. The Greenbergian Word Order Cor- rections [J]. Language, 1992, (68): 81 -138.
  • 3Dryer, M. S. The branching direction theory revisi- ted [A]. S. Scalise, E. Magni and A. Bisetto. Uni- versals of Language Today [ C ]. Berlin : Springer, 2008. http://linguisties, buffalo, edu/people/fae- ulty/dryer/dryer/DryerBDTrevisited, pdf.
  • 4Haspelmath, M. 2006. Universals of word order [ OL]. http://email, eva. mpg. de/ haspelmt/ 6. WordOrder. pdf.
  • 5Huang, C. T. J. logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar [ D ]. Cambridge, MA : The MIT, 1982.
  • 6Li, C. N. and S. A. Thompson. Historical change of word order: A case study in Chinese and its implications [ A ]. J. M. Anderson & C. Jones. Historical linguistics [ C ]. Amsterdam: North- Holland, 1974. 199 - 217.
  • 7Li, C. N. and S. A. Thompson. The semantic function of word order in Chinese [A]. C. N. Li, Word order and word order change [ C ]. Austin : University of Texas Press, 1975. 163 - 195.
  • 8Light, T. Word order and word order change in Mandarin Chinese [ J ]. Journal of Chinese Lin- guistics, 1979, (7): 149-180.
  • 9Sun, C. F. and T. Giv6n. On the So-Called SOV Word Order in Mandarin Chinese: A Quantified Text Study and Its Implications [ J ]. Language, 1985, (61): 329-351.
  • 10Tai, J. H. Y. Chinese as an SOV Language [ J 1. Papers from the 9th Chicago Linguistic Society, 1973, (9) : 659 -671.

共引文献112

同被引文献134

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部