期刊文献+

合法性与法治:教义性视角下的考察 被引量:1

Legality and the Rule of Law: An Investigation from the Doctrinal Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对法治理想的恰当解释要区分政治性的法治观与教义性的法治观。教义性的法治观把法律视为一种自主性的规范实践,而非政治行动的工具,因此恰当的法治理论要呈现完整的合法性主张。合法性的概念分析要区分判准意义和教义性意义,哈特、富勒等理论家所发展的法治观关注了合法性的判准意义,但忽视了法律与价值世界的更深关联。德沃金对解释性概念的运用,使得法律在实践中的功能同时呈现出合法性的判准意义和教义性意义。法治观念在法律体系的运行同政治道德原则之间建立了实质关联,更具有理论吸引力。 In order to provide an appropriate interpretation of the ideal of rule of law,we need to distin-guish the political sense and the doctrinal sense of the notion. Rule of law in the doctrinal sense takes law as an autonomous normative practice rather than an instrument of political action. A proper theory of rule of law ought to present a complete view on legality. The conceptual analysis of legality should dis-tinguish the criterial sense and the doctrinal sense of the concept. The theories that Hart and Fuller de-veloped focus on the criterial sense of legality,but ignore the deeper connection between the law and the value world. Dworkin developed the interpretive concept of law and made the functions of law present both the criterial sense and the doctrinal sense of legality. This theory of the rule of law builds a sub-stantial connection between legal system and political morality,and thus is more appealing theoretically.
作者 郑玉双
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期76-84,共9页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 法治 合法性 判准 教义性概念 诠释性概念 rule of law legality criteria doctrinal concept interpretive concept
  • 相关文献

同被引文献56

  • 1蔡玉霞.论法律工具主义[J].理论观察,2004(4):62-64. 被引量:3
  • 2谢晖.法律工具主义评析[J].中国法学,1994(1):51-57. 被引量:66
  • 3[美]德沃金著.《身披法袍的正义》,周林刚、翟志勇译,北京大学出版社2010年版,第84页.
  • 4[美]塔玛纳哈著:《论法治--历史、政治和理论》,李桂林译,武汉大学出版社2010年版,第101页.
  • 5Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End: Threats to the Rule of Law, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 6参见[美]富勒著:《法律的道德性》,郑戈译,商务印书馆2005年版,第113页.
  • 7Jeremy Wa|dron, Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept ( in F|orida) ? Law and Philosophy, 2002, V. 21, No.2, pp. 137 - 164.
  • 8[美]德沃金著:《法律帝国》,李冠宜译,时英出版社2002年版,第75页.
  • 9See Martin Krygier, Four Puzzles About the Rule of Law: Why, What, Where? And Who Cares?, in James E. Fleming ed. , Getting to the Rule of Law, New York University Press, 2011, p. 68.
  • 10参见[英]拉兹著:《公共领域的伦理学》,葛四友译,江苏人民出版社2013年版,第440页.

引证文献1

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部