摘要
钱谦益身为一代史学宗师,虽然没有留下一部建文史,但通过其文集和史著中有关建文朝的零星记载,仍得以管窥他对建文朝历史的认识:靖难史观下主张文皇帝心事与让皇帝至德说,相信建文逊国出亡、诸臣从亡,逊国诸臣都是忠臣。这是明代中期以来史家反对《实录》曲笔、主张为建文帝正名的历史潮流的产物,得到世人的认可。
As a great master in historical field, QIAN Qian - yi did not write any book about Emperor Jianwen Perind. But through the fragmentary records about Emperor Jianwen in collected works and historical works, we can still get a glimpse of his historical cognition of Emperor Jianwen Period: to advocate Emperor Chengzu's worries and Emperor Jianwen morality theory under the Jingnan Event view, to believe that Emperor Jianwen abdicated the throne and fled from the capital Nanking with some officials, therefore, the ministers who worked for Emperor Jianwen were loyal ministers. It' s the product of a historical trend since the mid - 16th century, that is, some historians were against the indirect record of The Memoir of Ming Dynasty and advocated for nominal rectification of Emperor Jianwen, which gained people' s approval.
出处
《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》
2014年第2期68-70,共3页
Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社科基金项目(11BZS001)
关键词
钱谦益
历史认识
建文史
QIAN Qian - yi
historical cognition
Jianwen history