摘要
Aldisert介绍基本的演绎推理、归纳推理以及苏格拉底问答法的法律适用问题,分析在法律情境中形式和非形式的谬误,追溯这些因素在创造法律规则以及转换为更普遍法律原则时所扮演角色,阐释作为"非单调应用逻辑"的法律逻辑的构建机理,揭示法律逻辑应该是"像法律人一样地思考"的心智过程。因此,探讨Aldisert的法律逻辑观,不但对于法学院学生、法官和执业律师培养法律思维大有帮助,而且对中国法律逻辑教学与研究具有重要的指导意义。
Aldisert introduces the basic deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and the Socratic method of law applicability, analyzes the form and non-form of the fal acy in the legal context, Traces the role of these factors in the creation of the rule of law, and converted to the more general principles of law, explains the mechanism of Legal Logic as a non-monotonic applied logic, reveals legal logic should be the mental processes＆quot;like a le-gal person to think＆quot;. Based on the above view, Exploring Aldisert legal logic, not only a great help of training for law students, judging and practicing lawyers legal thinking, but also the important guiding significance of China＆#39;s legal logic of teaching and research.
基金
中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2012M511469)
山东大学(威海)教研基金资助项目(B201323)资助
关键词
法律逻辑
非单调应用逻辑
演绎推理
归纳推理
谬误
legal logic
Non-monotonic Applied Logic
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
fal acy
