期刊文献+

股腘动脉慢性完全闭塞性病变腔内治疗效果及预后分析 被引量:5

Efficacy and prognosis of endoluminal treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价股浅动脉、近端腘动脉慢性完全闭塞性病变(CTO)腔内治疗的效果及预后.方法 回顾性分析北京协和医院血管外科2009年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间,股动脉、近端腘动脉闭塞性病变患者148例(156条肢体),患者均接受腔内治疗.病变长度0.5~41.0 cm,平均(14±11) cm;按泛大西洋协作组织共识Ⅱ(TASC Ⅱ)分级划分,A级47条,B级40条,C级26条,D级43条.评估技术成功率、临床症状缓解率、围手术期保肢率及并发症发生率.Kaplan-Meier方法计算一期通畅率、二期通畅率、保肢率、生存率.Cox回归分析计算影响一期通畅率的危险因素.结果 腔内治疗技术成功率98.7%,临床成功率96.2%,围手术期保肢率99.4%,局部并发症发生率4.5%,系统并发症发生率1.9%.术后3、6、12、24、36个月的一期通畅率分别为 95.1%±1.8%,80.2%±3.4%,65.6%±4.3%,60.9%±4.6%,53.7%±5.8%;二期通畅率分别为 97.9%±1.2%,94.2%±2.0%,89.6%±2.8%,81.4%±3.9%,78.0%±5.0%;保肢率分别为99.4%±0.6%,99.4%±0.6%,97.8%±1.2%,97.8%±1.2%,97.8%±1.2%;生存率分别为99.2%±0.8%,98.4%±1.1%,97.5%±1.5%,94.9%±2.3%,91.2%±4.2%.Cox回归分析发现TASC Ⅱ C、D级病变(OR=1.776,95%CI 1.013~3.116)、流出道评分(OR=1.138,95%CI 1.016~1.275 )是影响一期通畅率的危险因素.结论 股浅动脉、近端腘动脉慢性完全闭塞性病变的腔内治疗安全、可靠.术后再狭窄发生率高,但通过再次干预仍可达到满意的保肢效果.TASC Ⅱ C、D级病变与流出道评分是导致再狭窄的相关危险因素. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of endoluminal treatment of superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery chronic total occlusions.Methods A prospectively collected database of 148 patients (156 limbs) between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2012 was retrospectively analysed.All the patients were treated with endoluminal interventions.The mean lesion length was (14±11) cm (0.5-41.0 cm).According to Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Ⅱ (TASC Ⅱ), 47 lesions were type A, 40 were type B, 26 were type C and 43 were type D.Technical success rate, clinical success rate, perioperative limb salvage rate and complication rate were evaluated.Primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, limb salvage rate and survival rate were calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.Cox-regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors associated with loss of primary patency.Results Technical success rate was 98.7%, clinical success rate was 96.2%, perioperative limb salvage rate was 99.4%, local complication rate was 4.5% and systemic complication rate was 1.9%.At 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery, the primary patency rates were 95.1%±1.8%,80.2%±3.4%, 65.6%±4.3%,60.9%±4.6% and 53.7%±5.8%, respectively.The secondary patency rates were 97.9%±1.2%,94.2%±2.0%,89.6%±2.8%,81.4%±3.9% and 78.0%±5.0%, respectively.The limb salvage rates were 99.4%±0.6%,99.4%±0.6%, 97.8%±1.2%, 97.8%±1.2%, and 97.8%±1.2%, respectively.The survival rates were 99.2%±0.8%,98.4%±1.1%,97.5%±1.5%,94.9%±2.3% and 91.2%±4.2%, respectively.TASC Ⅱ C/D lesions (OR=1.776, 95%CI 1.013~3.116) and runoff score (OR=1.138, 95%CI 1.016-1.275) were found to be associated with loss of primary patency.Conclusion Endoluminal intervention was a safe and efficacious method for treating femopopliteal artery chronic total occlusions.Satisfactory limb salvage rate can be reached despite of the high restenosis rate.TASC Ⅱ C/D lesions and runoff score were found to be risk factors associated with restenosis.
机构地区 北京协和医学院
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第9期641-645,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 首都医学发展科研基金“糖尿病下肢缺血外科治疗多中心随机对照和临床注册研究”(2009-2001)
关键词 动脉闭塞性疾病 股动脉 腘动脉 血管成形术 支架 Arterial occlusive diseases Femoral artery Popliteal artery Angioplasty Stent
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1DeRubertis BG,Faries PL,McKinsey JF,et al.Shifting paradigms in the treatment of lower extremity vascular disease:a report of 1000 percutaneous interventions[J].Ann Surg,2007,246:415-422.
  • 2Yacyshyn VJ,Thatipelli MR,Lennon RJ,et al.Predictors of failure of endovascular therapy for peripheral arterial disease[J].Angiology,2006,57:403-417.
  • 3Rutherford RB,Baker JD,Ernst C,et al.Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia:revised version[J].J Vasc Surg,1997,26:517-538.
  • 4Norgren L,Hiatt WR,Dormandy JA,et al.Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC Ⅱ)[J].J Vasc Surg,2007,45Suppl:5-67.
  • 5Met R,Van Lienden KP,Koelemay MJ,et al.Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease:a systematic review[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2008,31:687-697.
  • 6Mousnier A,Jean-Baptiste E,Sadaghianloo N,et al.Subintimal recanalization of femoropopliteal occlusive lesions in patients with critical ischemia:66 cases[J].Ann Vasc Surg,2013,27:467-473.
  • 7Gandhi S,Sakhuja R,Slovut DP,et al.Recent advances in percutaneous management of iliofemoral and superficial femoral artery disease[J].Cardiol Clin,2011,29:381-394.
  • 8张宏鹏,郭伟,刘小平,尹太,贾鑫,王立军,熊江,马晓辉.股浅动脉闭塞性病变中OutbackLTD导管的应用分析[J].中华外科杂志,2012,50(3):226-229. 被引量:6
  • 9Ye M,Zhang H,Huang X,et al.Retrograde popliteal approach for challenging occlusions of the femoral-popliteal arteries.J Vasc Surg,2013,58:84-89.
  • 10Sultan S,Hynes N.Five-year Irish trial of CLI patients with TASC Ⅱ type C/D lesions undergoing subintimal angioplasty or bypass surgery based on plaque echolucency[J].J Endovasc Ther,2009,16:270-283.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ, et al. Does subintimal angioplasty have a role in the treatment of severe lower extremity ischemia? J Vasc Surg,2003,37 : 386-391.
  • 2Beschorner U, Sixt S, Schwarzwalder U, et al. Recanalization of chronic occlusions of the superficial femoral artery using the Outback re-entry catheter: a single center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ,2009,74:934-938.
  • 3Husmann M, Federer J, Keo HH, et al. Bailout revascularization of chronic femoral artery occlusions with the new outback catheter following failed conventional endovascular intervention. J Endovasc Ther, 2009,16 : 206 -212.
  • 4Setacci C,Chisci E, de Donato G,et al. Subintimal angioplasty with the aid of a re-entry device for TASC C and D lesions of the SFA. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2009 ,38 :76-87.
  • 5Etezadi V, Benenati JF, Patel PJ, et al. The reentry catheter: a second chance for endoluminal re-entry at difficult lower extremity subintimal arterial recanalizations. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2010,21 : 730-734.
  • 6Wiesinger B, Steinkamp H, Konig C, et al. Technical report and preliminary clinical data of a novel catheter for luminal re-entry after subintimal dissection. Invest Radiol,2005 ,40 :725-728.
  • 7Bausback Y, Botsios S, Flux J, et at. Outback catheter for femoropopliteal occlusions: immediate and long-term results. J Endovasc Ther,2011,18 : 13-21.
  • 8A1-Ameri H, Shin V, Mayeda GS, et at. Peripheral chronic total occlusion treated with subintimal angioplasty and a true lumen re- entry device. J Invasive Cardiol,2009,21:468-472.
  • 9Bosiers M,Torsello G, Gissler HM, et at. Nitinol stent implantation in long superficial femoral artery lesions: 12 month results of the DURABILITY I study. J Endovasc Ther,2009,16:261-269.
  • 10陆信武,李维敏,黄英,陆民,黄新天,刘晓兵,殷敏毅,赵海光,蒋米尔.内膜下血管成形术治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞患者的临床评价[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(43):3047-3050. 被引量:15

共引文献5

同被引文献85

  • 1康涛,李晓强,唐军建,钱爱民,孟庆友.内膜下血管成形术治疗股腘动脉硬化闭塞症[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2012,4(2):79-82. 被引量:8
  • 2田硕,黄新天,殷敏毅,陆信武,李维敏,黄英,陆民,蒋米尔.下肢动脉粥样硬化闭塞症腔内治疗后再闭塞的原因分析及应对策略[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2013,5(2):83-85. 被引量:12
  • 3常光其,武日东.主髂动脉闭塞症的治疗策略[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2016,8(2):101-103. 被引量:5
  • 4罗心平,施海明,朱军,李剑,倪唤春,王彩萍,李勇,洪咏,范维琥.不同种类冠状动脉药物洗脱支架混合使用87例临床研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(3):154-157. 被引量:2
  • 5谷涌泉,张建,齐立行,李建新,俞恒锡,李学锋,郭连瑞,崔世军,罗涛,汪忠镐.动脉自膨式支架置入治疗下肢缺血[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(11):824-826. 被引量:30
  • 6Zeller T.Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease.Vasc Med,2007; 12(3): 223-234.
  • 7Died< S,Andrej S,Giancado B,et al.Tecbniques for peripheral interventions. Munich, Urban & Vogel Gmb H, 2007:28-45.
  • 8Norgren L,Hiatt WR,Dormandy JA,et al.lnter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease Int Angiol,2007;26:81-157.
  • 9Kim SJ,Kim W, Kim JB,et al.Determinants of procedural success and patency following subintimal angioplasty in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal arterial disease. Cire J,2010:74:1959-1964.
  • 10European Stroke Organisation,Tendera M,Aboyans V, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22): 2851-2906.

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部