期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征应用磺达肝素钠与低分子肝素出血风险比较的meta分析 被引量:1

Fondaparinux vs. low molecular weight heparin in bleeding risk of acute coronary syndrome: meta-analysis of prospective studies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价磺达肝素钠应用于急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)的安全性。方法:通过全面检索国内外关于低分子肝素(low molecular weight heparin,LMWH)和磺达肝素钠治疗ACS的随机对照研究文献,筛选出符合评价标准的文献,采用RevMan5.1软件进行meta分析,采用Stata 12.0 Egger线性回归法评估纳入文献的发表偏倚。结果:磺达肝素钠组应用于ACS的主要出血事件(RR=0.53,95%CI:0.45-0.61;Z=8.10,P<0.01)、小出血事件(RR=0.33;95%CI:0.27-0.41;Z=10.30;P<0.01)以及总体出血事件(RR=0.44,95%CI:0.39-0.50;Z=13.03,P<0.01)的发生率均低于LMWH组,差别有统计学意义。结论:ACS应用磺达肝素钠较LMWH安全。 AIM: To compare the safety between fondaparinux and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), excluding ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: The authors applied the techniques of meta-analysis to data extracted from the published literature addressing this relation. RESULTS: Five trials with a total of 20680 patients were included. Compared with LMWH, fondaparinux was associated with reduced major bleeding (risk ratio [RR] =0.53;95% CI:0.45 to 0.61; Z=8.10; P〈0.01), minor bleeding (RR=0.33, 95% CI:0.27 to 0.41; Z=10.30, P〈0.01) and total bleeding (RR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.50; Z= 13.03, P 〈0.01). CONCLUSION: Fondaparinux is safer than low molecular weight heparin in anticoagulant treatment of ACS.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期174-178,共5页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 磺达肝素钠 低分子肝素 急性冠脉综合征 出血 安全性 META分析 Fondaparinux low molecular weight heparin acute coronary syndrome bleeding safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献49

  • 1尹明.降纤酶联用低分子肝素治疗心肌梗死5例临床观察[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2005,12(4):247-247. 被引量:1
  • 2胡大一,孙艺红.冠心病药物治疗的最新进展和展望[J].中国实用内科杂志:临床前沿版,2006,26(1):88-91. 被引量:49
  • 3Eikelboom JW,Mehta SR,Anand SS,et al.Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes.Circulation,2006,114:774-782.
  • 4Mehta SR,Granger CB,Eikelboom JW,et al.Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:results from the OASIS-5 trial.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:1742-1751.
  • 5Joyner CD,Peters R J,Afzal R,et al.Fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation:outcomes and treatment effect across different levels of risk.Am Heart J,2009,157:502-508.
  • 6Budaj A,Eikelboom JW,Mehta SR,et al.Improving clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding in patients with nonST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.Eur Heart J,2009,30:655-661.
  • 7Yusuf S,Mehta SR,Chrolavicius S,et al.Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:the OASIS-6 randomized trial.JAMA,2006,295:1519-1530.
  • 8Anderson JL,Adams CD,Antman EM,et al.ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction,a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines:developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons:endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.Circulation,2007,116:e148-304.
  • 9Yusuf S,Reddy S,Ounpuu S,et al.Global burden of cardiovascular diseases,part 1:general considerations,the epidemiologic transition,risk factors,and impact of urbanization.Circulation,2001,104:2746-2753.
  • 10Bassand JP,Hamm CW,Ardissino D,et al.Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.Eur Heart J,2007,28:1598-1660.

共引文献23

同被引文献26

  • 1中国急性冠状动脉综合征多中心临床研究协作组.中国多省市急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者治疗现状与指南差距分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(9):789-792. 被引量:47
  • 2刘梅颜.ExTRACT-TIMI 25研究[J].中国医药导刊,2006,8(5):378-379. 被引量:1
  • 3Fox KA, Eagle KA, Gore JM, et al. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, 1999 to 2009-~3RACE[J]. Heart, 2010, 96(14): 1095-1101. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.190827.
  • 4Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg PG, James SK, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation[J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20): 2569-2619. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 5American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, O'Gara PT, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61: e78-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019.
  • 6Mousa SA, Fareed J, Iqbal O, et al. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor in thrombosis and beyond[J]. Methods Mol Med, 2004,93:133-155.
  • 7Tobu M, Ma Q, Iqbal O, et al. Comparative tissue factor pathway inhibitor release potential of heparins[J]. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2005, 11(1):37-47.
  • 8Greinacher A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: frequency and pathogenesis[J]. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb, 2006, 35(1/ 2): 37-45.
  • 9Turpie AG. Fondaparinux: a Factor Xa inhibitor for antithrombotic therapy[J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2004, 5 (6): 1373-1384.
  • 10Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin:the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction[J]. Lancet, 2001, 358(9282): 605-613.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部