期刊文献+

TFF1和TFF3在结直肠癌中的表达与临床病理特点及预后的关系 被引量:8

TFF1 and TFF3 expressions in colorectal cancer and their relationship with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检测三叶因子1(trefoil factor,TFF1)和三叶因子3(TFF3)在结直肠癌组织、癌旁组织及转移淋巴结中的表达,评价其与肿瘤发生、转移和预后的关系。方法:采用免疫组织化学SP法检测65例结直肠癌、30例癌旁组织、25例转移淋巴结中TFF1和TFF3的表达,分析二者表达的差异及其与临床病理特征和预后的关系。结果:TFF1在癌旁组织、癌组织和转移淋巴结中表达逐渐增高(26.7%,70.8%,96%,两两比较均P<0.05)。癌组织和转移淋巴结与癌旁组织比较,TFF3表达率均有降低(100%vs.84.6%或80%,均P<0.05),癌组织和转移淋巴结之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TFF1在结直肠癌中的表达仅与肿瘤分化程度相关(P<0.05);TFF3表达与淋巴结转移及TNM分期有关(均P<0.05)。TFF1在结直肠癌中的表达与TFF3呈负相关(P=0.014,r=-0.291)。TFF1表达水平与总生存率无相关性(P=0.639),而TFF3表达水平与总生存率有关(P=0.045)。Cox比例风险模型单因素分析显示,浸润深度、淋巴结转移、远处转移、TNM分期等为影响预后的相关因素。多因素分析显示,淋巴结转移、远处转移、TNM分期和TFF3为预后的影响因素。结论:TFF1和TFF3表达率与结直肠癌的发生、转移和预后密切相关。两者可能在结直肠癌的侵袭、转移中存在共同作用,相互影响。 Objective: To detect the TFF1 and TFF3 expressions in colorectal cancer tissue, adjacent normal tissue, and lymph node metastases, and to evaluate their relationship with tumor occurrence and metastasis. Methods: The expressions of TFF 1 and TFF3 were detected by immunohistochemistry (SP method) in 30 adjacent normal colorectal mucosa specimens, 65 colorectal adenocarcino-ma specimens, and 25 metastatic lymph node specimens. The differences in the expression of TFF 1 and TFF3 in different tissues were compared, and their correlation with the clinicopathological features and survival were analyzed. Results: The expression of TFF1 grad- ually increased along with the sequence of colorectal cancer tissue, adjacent normal tissue, and lymph node metastases (26.7%, 70.8%, and 96%, respectively; P〈0.05 in pairwise comparison). Unlike in normal adjacent tissue, the expressions of TFF1 decreased in colorec- tal cancer or metastatic lymph node (100% vs. 84.6% or 80%, P〈0.05). No statistical significance was observed between colorectal can-cer and metastatic lymph node (P〉0.05). Only differentiation related to TFF1 expression was observed (P〈0.05). TFF3 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis and TNM staging (P〈0.05). A negative correlation was found between TFF3 and TFF1 expres-sions in colorectal cancer (r=-0.291, P=0.014). No association was found between the TFF1 expression levels and overall survival (P= 0.639), whereas the TFF3 expression level was correlated with survival (P=0.045). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that in- filtration depth, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and pathological staging were the related factors affecting the prognosis through univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, pathological staging, and TFF3 were the influencing factors of prognosis. Conclusion: TFF 1 and TFF3 expressions are closely related to the incidence, me-tastasis, and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Both can function together in the invasion and the metastasis of colorectal cancer.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期381-385,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 TFF1 TFF3 结直肠癌 临床病理特点 预后 TFF1, TFF3, colorectal cancer, clinical pathological features, prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1段光杰,阎晓初,卞修武,李军,陈鑫.β-链接素和基质金属蛋白酶-7在结直肠腺瘤腺癌组织表达的意义[J].中华病理学杂志,2004,33(6):518-522. 被引量:18
  • 2周晓东,吕农华.大肠癌的流行病学研究现状[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2006,11(3):149-151. 被引量:72
  • 3赵旭东,王亚杰.结直肠癌发生的基因机制研究进展[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(11):1462-1464. 被引量:3
  • 4顾国利,魏学明,王石林,任力,郑爱民,黄蓉蓉,胡益云.大肠癌E-cadherin,β-catenin,MMP-7表达及其临床意义[J].世界华人消化杂志,2007,15(4):375-380. 被引量:17
  • 5Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 581-592.
  • 6Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 765-781.
  • 7Buecher B, Bezieau S, Dufilhol C, Cauchin E, Heymann MF, Mosnier JF. [Emerging concepts in colorectal serrated polyps]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2007; 31: 39-54.
  • 8Suemori S, Lynch-Devaney K, Podolsky DK. Identification and characterization of rat intestinal trefoil factor: tissue- and cell-specific member of the trefoil protein family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88: 11017-11021.
  • 9Thim L, W?ldike HF, Nielsen PF, Christensen M, Lynch-Devaney K, Podolsky DK. Characterization of human and rat intestinal trefoil factor produced in yeast. Biochemistry 1995; 34: 4757-4764.
  • 10Kouznetsova I, Kalinski T, Peitz U, M?nkemüller KE, Kalbacher H, Vieth M, Meyer F, Roessner A, Malfertheiner P, Lippert H, Hoffmann W. Localization of TFF3 peptide in human esophageal submucosal glands and gastric cardia: differentiation of two types of gastric pit cells along the rostro-caudal axis. Cell Tissue Res 2007; 328: 365-374.

共引文献52

同被引文献81

  • 1谢立平,秦杰,郑祥毅,沈华峰,陈昭典,蔡松良,张志根,丁伟,任国平,王丽君,余心如.481例前列腺癌患者年龄与病理构成分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(6):428-430. 被引量:36
  • 2冯晓莉,主译.泌尿系统及男性生殖器官肿瘤病理学和遗传学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,257-263.
  • 3Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013, 63(1) : 11-30.
  • 4Im S, Yoo C, Juug JH, et al. Reduced expression of TFF1 and increased expression of TFF3 in gastric cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Int J Med Sci, 2013, 10(2): 133-140.
  • 5Emami S, Rodrigues S, Rodrigue CM, et al. Trefoil factor family (TFF) peptidcs and cancer progression. Peptides, 2004, 25 ( 5 ) : 885-898.
  • 6Thuwajit P, Chawengrattanachot W, Thuwajit C, et al. Increased TFF1 trefoil protein expression in Opisthorehis viverrini-assoeiat- ed cholangiocarcinoma is important for invasive promotion. Hcpa- tol Res, 2007, 37(4) : 295-304.
  • 7Bougen NM, Amiry N, Yuan Y, et al. Trefoil factor 1 suppres- sion of E-CADHERIN enhances prostate carcinoma cell invasive- hess and metastasis. Cancer Lett, 2013, 332(1) : 19-29.
  • 8Abdou AG, Aiad HA, Sultan SM. pS2(TFFI) expression in prostate car- cinorra: Correlation with steroid receptor status. APMIS, 2008, 116(11) : 961-971.
  • 9Rickman DS, Chen YB, Banerjee S, et al. ERG cooperates with androgen receptor in regulating trefoil factor 3 in prostate cancer disease progression. Neoplasia, 2010, 12(12) : 1031-1040.
  • 10Perry JK, Kannan N, Grandison PM, et al. Are trefoil factors oncogenie? Trends Endoerinol Metab, 2008, 19(2) : 74-81.

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部