摘要
目的:评价超声骨刀行牙冠延长术对保留牙体缺损位于龈下3mm以内、厚龈生物型前牙的临床疗效。方法:纳入厚龈生物型前牙肩台、龋坏或折裂位点位于龈下3mm以内的患者20例。行必要的牙周基础治疗和根管治疗后随机分为两组,实验组10例29个患牙,采用超声骨刀去骨行冠延长术;对照组10例34个患牙,采用高速涡轮手机去骨行冠延长术。测量术前和术后4、8周、6月龈沟出血指数(SBI)、菌斑指数(PLI)及术后6月牙龈退缩率,并记录手术所需时间。结果:术后4、8周,实验组SBI和PLI均低于对照组(P〈0.05),6月时两组SBI和PLI无显著差异(P〉0.05);术后6月实验组均无牙龈退缩,对照组7个牙有0.5-1.0mm的牙龈退缩,两组相比P〈0.05;实验组平均手术时间多于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论:采用超声骨刀行牙冠延长术对保留牙体缺损位于龈下3mm内的厚龈生物型前牙,具有比传统方法更好的临床疗效。
AIM: To evaluate the clinical effect of piezosurgery in crown lengthening of anterior teeth with thick gingival biotype. METItODS: 20 patients with 63 anterior tooth defects 3 mm below gingiva and with thick gingival biotype were ineluded. After periodontal non - surgical treatment and root canal therapy, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The crowns were lengthened with piezosurgery in experimental group ( 10 patients with 29 teeth) and high - speed air turbine in control group( 10 patients with 34 teeth) respectively. Surgery duration was recorded. Sulcus bleeding index (SBIi and plaque index (PLI) were measured before surgery and 4weaks, 8 and 6 months after surgery. Gingival recession (GR) was measured at 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Duration of surgery (min/tooth) in experimental and control group was 17.0 ± 1.87 and 9.90 ±1.53 respectively( P 〈 0.05 ). SBI and PLI at 4 and 8 week after surgery in piezosurgery group were lower than those in control group ( P 〈 0.05 ), while at 6 month after surgery were not statistically different between groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). GR was observed in 7 teeth of control group 6 month after surgery , but not observed in experimental group ( P 〈 0.05 ). CONCLUSION: Piezosurgery is more effective than high-speed air turbine in the treatment of anterior teeth with thick gingival biotype.
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2014年第3期159-161,154,共4页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金
惠州市科技计划项目(2013Y110)
关键词
超声骨刀
冠延长
牙龈退宿
牙龈生物型
piezosurgery
crown lengthening
gingival recession
periodontal biotype