期刊文献+

ISP免费对等互联策略

ISP free peering strategy
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立免费对等关系,可以令互联网服务提供商(ISP)减少费用开销并获得更好的传输性能。单个ISP在选择对等互联对象中,评估不同互联对象带来的开销、收益及双方的互联意愿等至关重要,然而它们的关系比较复杂。该文选择以接入点(POP)地理位置之间的距离、假设对等互联建立后的流量、两个ISP在全网中的层次地位来对上述关系进行简化,从而提出了通过计算距离、流量和层次来进行互联选择的简便方法。通过中国教育和科研计算机网(CERNET)的实际对等互联选择过程,验证了该方法的效果。 Free peering reduces 1SP costs and achieves better performance. When an ISP chooses a peer, the ISP must evaluate the cost, the profit and the bilateral willingness to peer for each peering candidate. However, these factors have complex relationships. This analysis uses the distances between POPs (Point of Presence), the potential traffic volume on the peering link, and the layer locations of the two ISPs in the Internet architecture to simplify the complex relationships with a convenient method given to complete the choice. Simulations show how to use this method to solve the free peering decision problem on the China education and research tmtwork (CERNET).
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1586-1590,共5页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(61170211) 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(61202356) 国家"九七三"重点基础研究项目(2012CB315806) 教育部博士点基金项目(20110002110056 20130002110058)
关键词 互联网络 免费对等互联 距离 流量 层次 Internet free peering distance traffic volume layer
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Norton W B. Internet service providers and peering [R/OL]. [2012-07-01]. http://www-users. cselabs. umn. edu/classes/ Spring-20 11/ csci5 2 21 /Papers/ norton-peering. pdf.
  • 2Norton W B. The art of peering: the peering playbook [R/OL]. [2012-07-01]. http://drpeering. net/white- papers/ Art-Of-Peering- The-Peering-Playbook. html.
  • 3Dhamdhere A, Dovrolis C, Francois P. A value-based framework for Internet peering agreements [C]/ / The 22nd International Teletraffic Congress. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, 2010: Paper 9.
  • 4Chang H, Jamin S, Willinger W. To peer or not to peer: Modeling the evolution of the Internet's AS-level topology [C]/ / 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE Press, 2006: 1785 - 1796.
  • 5Baake P, Wichmann T. On the economics of Internet peering [J]. Netnomic s , 1998, 1(1): 89 -105.
  • 6Weiss M B, Shin S J. Internet interconnection economic model and its analysis: Peering and settlement [J]. Netnomics , 2004, 6(1): 43-57.
  • 7JahnE, Prufer J. Interconnection and competition among asymmetric networks in the Internet backbone market [J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2008, 20(3): 243-256.
  • 8Badasyan N, Chakrabarti S. A simple game-theoretic analysis of peering and transit contracting among internet service providers [J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2008, 32 ( 1) : 4- 18.
  • 9Lippert S, Spagnolo G. Internet peering as a network of relations [J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2008, 32( 1): 33- 49.
  • 10Shrimali G, Kumar S. Paid peering among internet service providers [C]/ / Proceeding GameNets workshop on Game Theory for Communications and Networks. Pisa , Italy: ACM Press, 2006: Paper II.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部