摘要
1982年《联合国海洋法公约》争端解决机制是通过第15部分和附件五至八,共一百多个条款确立的。附件七下的仲裁法庭是争端解决机制的一部分,发挥着"剩余备用"的作用。2013年1月22日,菲律宾依据《联合国海洋法公约》第287条,向中国提交了就南海问题提起国际仲裁的照会及通知。2月19日,中方声明不接受菲方所提仲裁,并将菲方照会及所附通知退回。本文得出的结论是,菲方的仲裁主张不成立,国际法庭或仲裁庭没有管辖权。
The dispute settlement mechanism is found in Part XV and Annex V-VIII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which includes a total of over one hundred provisions. Arbitration under Annex VII is part of the dispute settlement mechanism and the default means of dispute settlement. On 22 January 2013, the Philippines addressed to China the notification and statement of submission of South China Sea issue to international arbitration, pursuant to Article 287. On 19 February 2013, China rejected and returned the Philippines＇ notification and statement. This article comes to the conclusion that the Philippines＇ claim isn＇ t established, because neither the International Tribunal nor the Arbitral Tribunal has ju- risdiction to deal with the issue.
出处
《太平洋学报》
CSSCI
2013年第12期63-70,共8页
Pacific Journal
基金
中国太平洋学会2010年重大项目"东
南中国海诸岛中有争议岛屿的史地考证及相关问题研究"(2200214)的研究成果
关键词
仲裁法庭
诉求
争端
管辖权
arbitration tribunal
claim
dispute
jurisdiction
