期刊文献+

接受肝移植的晚期肝病患者高动力循环水平与MELD评分系统的临床研究 被引量:2

A clinical study on the evaluation by MELD scoring system and hyperdynamic circulation changes in end-stage liver diseases patients following liver transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨接受肝移植的晚期肝病患者MELD评分级别与其血流动力学高动力循环(HDC)水平的关系。方法针对146例接受肝移植的晚期肝病患者,术前抽血检查总胆红素(TBil)、血肌酐(Scre)、凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值(INR),以此计算 MELD 分值并进行分级(3级,Ⅰ 级≤10~15分,Ⅱ级15~25分,Ⅲ级≥25分);另于手术开始前经肺动脉导管(Swan-Ganz导管)监测并记录HR、MAP、CO、CI、SVR、SVRI、MPAP、PAWP、PVR、LVSWI及RVSWI等指标;最后比较不同MELD分值级别与血流动力学变化的关系。结果 MELD 评分3个级别间CO分别是:(6.4±1.7)L/min,(8.5±2.0)L/min,(9.5±2.6)L/min;CI分别是:(3.7±1.1)L·min-1·m-2,(5.1±1.4)L·min-1·m-2,(5.4±1.4)L·min-1·m-2。SVR分别是:(978.9±260.5)dyn·s·cm-5,(653.7±254.1)dyn·s·cm-5,(594.4±204.2)dyn·s·cm-5;SVRI分别是:(1743.8±458.3) dyn·s·cm-5·m-2,(1126.1±478.1)dyn·s·cm-5·m-2,(1031.5±335.3) dyn·s·cm-5·m-2。其变化均有统计学差异(P<0.01);但两两比较仅MELD Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级组相对于I级有统计学差异(P<0.01),而Ⅲ级与Ⅱ级组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。HR、MAP、MPAP、PAWP、PVR、LVSWI及RVSWI等指标随MELD分值变化无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论晚期肝病患者HDC主要表现在高的心输出量和低的体循环血管阻力两个方面,即高的 CO&CI 与低的 SVR&SVRI,而且伴随肝功能MELD分值升高至15后,其血流动力学的HDC特征更明显,但代偿期肝硬化即便合并肝癌的患者HDC特征可能并不明显。 Objective To explore the relationship between the hyperdynamic circulatory characteristics and the different levels of MELD score in end-stage liver disease patients following liver transplantation. Methods The 146 end-stage liver disease patients following orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT) were examined and following results were obtained, including total bilirubin (TBil), serum creatinine (Scre) and prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR), then calculated MELD score with them and divided into 3 groups according to the score (Ⅰ: ≤10-15, Ⅱ: 15-25, Ⅲ: ≥25). Swan-Ganz catheter mornitoring was performed in those patients before OLT operation, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PAWP) and pulmonary vascular resistance(PVR) were collected respectively. The hyperdynamic circulatory characteristics of different MELD score groups were analyzed. Results The CO&CI of MELD Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ level groups was (6.4±1.7) L/min, (8.5±2.0) L/min, (9.5±2.6) L/min&(3.7±1.1) L·min-1·m-2, (5.1±1.4) L·min-1·m-2, (5.4±1.4) L·min-1·m-2 respectively (P〈0.01), and the SVR&SVRI of MELD Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ level groups was (978.9±260.5) dyn·s·cm-5, (653.7±254.1) dyn·s·cm-5, (594.4±204.2) dyn·s·cm-5,(1743.8±458.3) dyn·s·cm-5·m-2, (1126.1±478.1) dyn·s·cm-5·m-2, (1031.5±335.3)·s·cm-5·m-2, (P〈0.01). The SVR in patients of MELD 15 score(≥Ⅱ grade ) or more showed significant decrease, and meanwhile the CO significant increased. Although the MELD score's change, no significant difference with HR, MAP, MPAP, PAWP, PVR, LVSWI and RVSWI was observed (P〉0.05). Conclusion The MELD score may exactly predict the severity of HDC. The HDC in end-stage liver disease patients was mainly manifested in two aspects of high cardiac output and low systemic vascular resistance, and with the higher MELD score, the more obvious hemodynamic characteristics of HDC. But for the compensated cirrhosis (MELD〈15 score ) even in patients with liver cancer the HDC feature was not obvious.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第24期127-130,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 医院创新基金资助课题(KT2009011)
关键词 肝硬化 肝功能衰竭 血流动力学 高动力循环 MELD评分 Liver cirrhosis Liver failure Hemodynamics Hyperdynamic circulation MELDscoring system
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Blei AT,Mazhar S,Davidson CJ. Hemodynamic evaluation before liver transplantation insights into the portal hypertensive syndrome[J].{H}Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology,2007.S323-S329.
  • 2王永刚,李克.晚期肝病的血流动力学变化[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,7(10):158-161. 被引量:4
  • 3Onaea NN,Levy MF,Sanehez EQ. A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation[J].{H}Liver Transplantation,2003.117-121.
  • 4郜玉峰,吴玲,苏菲.MELD评分在终末期肝病中的应用[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2010,13(5):393-396. 被引量:13
  • 5周鸿,刘晔,陈炜,徐庆,朱静芬,罗蒙.MELD评分在肝硬化患者预后评估中作用的临床研究[J].肝胆外科杂志,2010,18(4):251-256. 被引量:18
  • 6Henriksen JH,Mol er S. Cardiac and systemic haemodynamic complications of liver cirrhosis[J].{H}Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal,2009.218-225.
  • 7Zekanovic D,Ljubicic N,Boban M. Doppler ultrasound of hepatic and system hemodynamics in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis[J].{H}Digestive Diseases and Sciences,2010.458-466.
  • 8Kumar A,Das K,Sharma P. Hemodynamic studies in acute-on-chronic liver failure[J].{H}Digestive Diseases and Sciences,2009.869-878.
  • 9Kumar A,Mishra SR,Sharma P. Clinical,laboratory,and hemodynamic parameters in portal hypertensive gastropathy:a study of 254 cirrhotics[J].{H}Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology,2010.294-300.
  • 10Siniscalchi A,Aurini L,Spedicato S. Hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis:predictive factors and outcome following liver transplantation[J].{H}Minerva Anestesiologica,2013.15-23.

二级参考文献31

  • 1George V. Papatheodoridis,Evangelos Cholongitas,Eleni Dimitriadou,Giota Touloumi,Vassilios Sevastianos,Athanasios J. Archimandritis.MELD vs Child-Pugh and creatinine-modified Child-Pugh score for Dredicting survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(20):3099-3104. 被引量:32
  • 2周文红,应豪,叶俊茂.血浆置换治疗慢性重型肝炎终末期肝病模型预后分析[J].医学研究杂志,2007,36(1):50-53. 被引量:3
  • 3MALINCHOC M,KAMATH PS,GORDON FD,et al.A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemie shunts[J].Hepatology,2000,31:864-870.
  • 4KAMATH PS,WIESNER RH,MALINCHOC M,et al.A model to predict survival in patients with end stage liver disease[J].Hepatology,2001,33(2):464-470.
  • 5WIESNER RH,EDWARDS E,FREEMAN R,et al.Model for end-stage liver disease(MELD)and allocation of donor livers[J].Gastroenterology,2003,124:91-96.
  • 6OLTHOFF KM,BROWN RS,DELMONICO FL,et al.Summary report of a national conference:evolving concepts in liver allocation in the MELD and PELD era[J].Liver Transpl,2004,10(10 suppl 2):A6-22.
  • 7ONACA NN,LEVY MF,SANCHEZ EQ,et al.A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after live transplantation[J].Liver Transpl,2003,9:.117-123.
  • 8RAVAIOLI M,GRAZI GL,ERCOLANI G,et al.Efficacy MELD score in predicting survival after live retransplantation[J].Transplant Proc,2004,36:2748-2749.
  • 9MERION RM,SCHAUBEL DE,DYKSTRA DM,et al.The survival benefit of liver transplantation[J].Am J Transplant,2005,5:307-313.
  • 10YAO FY,SAAB S,BASS NM,et al.Prediction of survival after liver retransplantation for late graft failure based on preoperative prognostic scores[J].Hepatology,2004,39(1):230-238.

共引文献32

同被引文献14

  • 1柳林,杨海山,孙昱,于世龙.自体脂肪间充质干细胞对晚期肝病影响的初步临床研究[J].中国实验诊断学,2007,11(4):473-476. 被引量:23
  • 2岑敏琼,陈凤华,陈培祥,等.自体骨髓干细胞移植治疗28例晚期肝病患者的护理配合[J].医学信息,2013,(25):377-378.
  • 3Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, et al. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery [ J ]. Eur J Anaesthesio1,2010,27 (6) :555-561.
  • 4Fu Q, Mi W D, Zhang H. Stroke volume variation and pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness during resection of primary retroperitoneal tumors in Hans Chinesel J]. Biosci Trends,2012,6( 1 ) :38-43.
  • 5Suehiro K, Rinka H, Ishikawa J, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing airway pressure release ventilation E J ]- An- aesth Intensive Care,2012,40 ( 5 ) :767-772.
  • 6Slagt C, Helmi M, Malagon I, et al. Calibrated versus un- calibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monito- ring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock:an obser- vational study [ J ]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2015,32 ( 1 ) : 5-12.
  • 7Botta F, Giannini E, Romagnoli P, et al. MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver func- tion : a European study [ J 1. Gut, 2003,52 ( 1 ) : 134-139.
  • 8蔡勤芳,袁维秀,米卫东.不同潮气量通气患者液体治疗时每搏量变异度判断扩容效应的阈值[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2010,30(7):817-819. 被引量:19
  • 9杨秀娟,李士通.不同机械通气模式时每搏量变异度对容量治疗反应性的变化[J].上海医学,2011,34(2):145-147. 被引量:6
  • 10吴琼,董秀华,卿恩明,卢家凯.吸入七氟烷麻醉对非发绀型先天性心脏病患儿心脏手术围术期心肌损伤的影响[J].心肺血管病杂志,2012,31(2):124-126. 被引量:5

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部