期刊文献+

支架成形术治疗颈内动脉起始段狭窄的临床分析 被引量:1

A clinical analysis of endovascular stenting for carotid artery stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈动脉血管内支架成形术(CAS)治疗颈内动脉起始段狭窄的疗效及并发症。方法回顾性分析87例颈内动脉起始段狭窄患者行87例次CAS的临床资料。结果 87例患者的手术成功率100%。术中51例出现血压下降、心动过缓,3例出现栓子脱落导致动脉到动脉栓塞,1例出现部分性癫痫发作,1例留下永久性神经功能障碍,永久性神经功能障碍并发症发生率为1.1%,暂时性神经功能障碍发生率为3.4%;术后对87例患者进行6个月至2年随访,1例出现有症状性再狭窄,6例出现无症状性再狭窄,1例出现再发卒中,再狭窄发生率为8.1%,卒中再发率为1.1%。结论 CAS治疗颈动脉狭窄是一种有效且相对安全的方法,但应重视术中及术后并发症的预防及处理。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and complications of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods The clinical data of 87 patients with carotid stenosis, who were implanted 87 stents, was analyzed retrospectively. Results The procedural success rate was 100%. During the procedures, 51 patients suffered from descent of heart rate and blood pressure, 3 patients suffered from embolism caused by dislodgment of emboli, and 1 patient suffered from partial seizure. The permanent neural dysfunction rate was 1.1%, and temporal neural dysfunction rate was 3.4%. During the follow-up with 87 patients between 6 months and 2 years, symptomatic restenosis occurred in 1 patients, symptomless restenosis occurred in 6 patients, and minor stoke occurred in 1 patients. The restenosis rate was 8.1% and recurrent stoke rate was 1.1%. Conelsions CAS is a safe and effective method to treat carotid stenosis, however, we should pay attention to the prevention and treatment of its complications.
出处 《中华脑血管病杂志(电子版)》 2013年第5期8-11,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition)
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 支架 并发症 疗效 Carotid artery stenosis Stent Complication Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Kazmierski MK. Stenosis of carotid arteries[J]. Wiad Lek, 2003, 56(5-6): 260-265.
  • 2Simonertti G, Gandini R, Versaci F, et al. Caiotid artery stenting: findings based on 8 years' experience[J]. Radiol Med, 2009, 114(1): 95-110.
  • 3Kimiagar I, Klein C, Rabey JM, et al. Carotid artery stenting in high risk patients with carotid artery stenosis not eligible for endarterectomy: clinical outcome after 5 years[J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2008,10(2): 121-124.
  • 4Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363:11-23.
  • 5Brown KE, Usman A, Kibbe MR, et al. Carotid stenting using tapered and nontapered stents: associated neurological complications and restenosis rates[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(4): 439-445.
  • 6Leisch F, Kerschner K, Hofmann R, et al. Carotid sinus reactions during carotid artery stenting: predictors, incidence, and influence on clinical outcome[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 58:516.
  • 7Mendelsohn FO, Weissman NJ, Lederman RJ, et al. Acute hemodynamic change during carotid artery stenting[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998, 82: 1077.
  • 8Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the globle carotid artery stent registry[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003,60:259-266.
  • 9Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, et al. Results of the stent?protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 year: a multinational, prospective, randomized trial. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 893-902.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部