高中数学教科书中的“阅读材料”比较研究——以中国《人教A版》与韩国《未来N版》教材为例

A Comparative Study on“Reading Materials”in High-school Mathematics Textbooks——Taking Examples of Chinese PEP-A Version and Korean Mirae-N Version

以中韩两国的主流教材(即中国人教A版、韩国未来N版)为例,以文本研究法为主要方法,采用材料容量、学习领域、材料背景、编写体例、呈现方式等指标,定量对比分析人教A版与未来N版两种教材中"阅读材料"的呈现形式及其效果,努力建构数学教科书中"阅读材料"的研究方法。结果表明:韩国未来N版教材中的"阅读材料"容量是中国人教A版教材的1.6倍,两种教材都是代数领域的阅读材料所占比重最大,但在材料背景、编写体例、呈现方式方面存在很大差异。在此基础上,借鉴韩国未来N版教材"彰显数学文化力"的编写特色,我国高中教学课程标准应明确指出数学课程内容与数学文化有机结合的媒介,树立"体现数学文化力"的"阅读材料"编写理念,加强"阅读材料"的丰富性、整合性。

This study makes comparative analyses of ＂reading material s＂ in Chinese and Korean high-school mainstream mathematics textbooks, that are, Chinese PEP-A textbooks and Korean Mirae-N textbooks. Taking textual analysis as the main study method, this study conducts a quantitatively comparative analysis of presentation forms and their effects of ＂reading materials＂, from aspects of material capacity, learning field, material background, writing style and presentation way, tries to construct the research methodology of ＂reading materials＂ in mathematics textbooks. It is indicated that, the material capacity in Korean textbooks is 1.6 times more than Chinese, proportions of reading materials in algebra area are the largest in both Chinese and Korean textbooks. However, they make considerable differences in materials background, writing style and presentation way. We suggest, use Mirae-N＇s writing characteristics ＂manifesting mathematical cultural power＂ for referertce, Chinese mathematical curriculum standards should explicitly indicate the media which can organically integrate mathematical contents and mathematical culture, establish new writing concepts of ＂reading materials embodying mathematical cultural power＂, and enhance richness and integration of ＂reading materials＂.