期刊文献+

交叉上市约束效应研究述评与未来展望——基于法律约束和声誉约束视角 被引量:1

A Literature Review of Bonding Effects of Cross-listing and Future Prospects:From the Perspectives of Legal Bonding and Reputational Bonding
原文传递
导出
摘要 近十年来,交叉上市约束效应的研究呈现出新的趋势,主要体现为将约束效应进行了法律约束和声誉约束的细分。根据此研究趋势,本文将相关文献分为两类:一类集中探讨交叉上市的法律约束效应,这类研究强调法律制度的合规性,是早期研究的主流;另一类集中探讨交叉上市的声誉约束效应,这类研究重视市场监督的有效性,正在逐步兴起。本文的文献梳理将有助于理解交叉上市约束效应的作用机理,并为今后的研究提供新的思路。 The studies of bonding effects of cross-listing have presented some new trends during the last ten years, which are mainly manifested by the subdivision of bonding effects into legal bond- ing and reputational bonding. Based on the research trend abovementioned, this paper divides the lit- erature into two categories, one focuses on the legal bonding effect of cross-listing and places empha- sis on the compliance of legal institutions, which is the mainstream in earlier studies; the other con- centrates on the reputational bonding effect of cross-listing and attaches importance to the effective- ness of market supervision, which is gradually emerging. A literature review not only helps to better understand the mechanism of bonding effects of cross-listing, but also proposes a new idea for further research.
作者 徐建 李维安
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期3-14,共12页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家社科基金重大招标项目<完善国有控股金融机构公司治理研究>(批准号:10ZD&035) 长江学者和创新团队发展计划(批准号:IRT0926) 国家自然科学基金重点项目<我国集团企业跨国治理与评价研究>(批准号:71132001) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<企业战略转型中的约束性问题研究>(批准号:11JJD630002)的资助
关键词 交叉上市 约束效应 法律约束 声誉约束 cross-listing bonding effect legal bonding reputational bonding
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1AbdalIah W and Goergen M. Does corporate control determine the cross-listing location? [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2008, 14 (3)..183-199.
  • 2Aggarwal R, et al. ADR holdings of US-based emerging market funds[J].Journal of Banking & Finance, 2007, 31(6) : 1649-1667.
  • 3Arping S and Saumer Z. Did SOX Section 404 make firms less opaque: Evidence from cross-Listed firms[J]. Contemporary Accoun- ting Research, 2013, Forthcoming.
  • 4Bailey W, et al. The economic consequences of increased disclosure.. Evidence from international cross-Listing[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 81(1)..175-213.
  • 5Boubakri N, et al. The choice of ADRs[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(9) : 2077-2095.
  • 6Bradshaw M T, et al. Accounting choice, home bias, and U.S. investment in non-U.S, firms[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2004, 42(5): 795-841.
  • 7Burns N, et al. Cross-listing and legal bonding: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2007, 31 (4): 1003-1031.
  • 8Chan K and Hameed A. Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging markets[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 80(1): 115-147.
  • 9Charitou A, et al. Cross-listing, bonding hypothesis and corporate governance[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2007, 34(7-8).. 1281-1306.
  • 10Charitou A and Louca C. Cross-listing and operating performance: Evidence from exchange-listed American depositary receipts[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2009, 36(1-2): 99-129.

二级参考文献116

共引文献23

同被引文献11

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部