摘要
法人作品在著作权法体系中具有重要地位,我国法律也作出了相应规定,但此种规定在理论与实践中却暴露出法人作品在定义与职务作品的界定存在混乱。文章通过对法人作品人格权和财产权的分析,以两大法系各国就法人作品的理论为基础,探寻我国法人作品问题的根源,提出完善建议,即:人身权归作者为原则,财产权以双方约定为基础,未约定或约定不清的则由法人享有。
The status of legal person’s work in the copyright law is of great importance. Relevant law about legal person’s work has been provided in our country, but it turns out a lot of shortage in theory and practice, including the unclear definition of legal person’s work and the ambiguity with works of employment. Thus, this paper analyzed the rationality of Anglo-American law system and continental law system via the personal right and property right of legal person’s work. Based on the two legal systems’ theory about legal person’s work., this paper put forward suggestions according to the current situation. This paper holds that as a principle, personal right belongs to the author, property right should be based on the agreement. For that not prescribed or not clearly prescribed in the agreement , it should belong to the legal person.
出处
《浙江万里学院学报》
2014年第1期60-63,共4页
Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词
法人作品
著作权
人身权
财产权
legal person’s works
copyright
personal right
property right