商标授权、确权案件中关于“以欺骗手段註册商标”的条件适用—评析日本特殊陶业株式会社与商标评审委员会、智择(香港)有限公司商标争议行政案~1
Conditions for Application of "Registration of Trademarks Acquired by Fraud" in Trademark Right Grant and Affirmation Cases: Comments on NGK v.TRAB and NTK Technologies(HK) Ltd., an Administrative Case of Trademark Dispute^1
摘要
在商标授权、确权案件的司法审查中,一般将商标能否被核准注册或维持有效的事由分为相对禁止事由和绝对禁止事由。《商标法》第四十一条第一款规定的＂以欺骗手段注册商标＂属于绝对禁止的事由,对于该条款的含义、适用的阶段及其具体的适用条件,在司法实践中一直存在不同的认识。本文以＂NTK＂商标撤销复审案为例,就司法实践中关于＂以欺骗手段注册商标＂的认定情形展开分析与思考,以求能夠有助于对该问题的理解。
出处
《中国专利与商标》
2014年第1期75-83,共9页
China Patents & Trademarks
参考文献6
-
1See the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court's Administrative Judgment No. Yizhongzhixingchuzi 773/2011, and the Beijing Higher People's Court's Administrative Judgment No. Gaoxingzhongzi 701/ 2012.
-
2Karl Larenz, Methodenlehere der Rechtswissenschaft, translated into Chinese by Chen Ai 'e, and published by the Commercial Press, 2003, Pp.132-149.
-
3See the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court's Administrative Judgment No. Yizhongxiugchuzi 178/2006.
-
4Kong Xiangjun, Principles and Precedents of Trademark and Unfair Competition Law, the Publishing House of Law, 2009, P.161.
-
5s See the Beijing Higher People's Court's Administrative Judgment No. Gaoxingzhongzi 246/2012.
-
6See the Beijing Higher People's Court's Administrative Judgment No. Gaoxingzhongzi 806/2010.
-
1董菁.法新社：2007年滑稽新闻精选[J].党建文汇（上半月）,2008(1):45-45.
-
2声音[J].中国社会保障,2014,0(10):8-8.
-
3公司[J].财经,2007,0(15):129-129.
-
4彩票诈骗近期在多国爆发欺骗手段不断翻新[J].彩票研究,2011(5):7-7.
-
5王乐怡.壮阳广告:你往何处去——记黑龙江省开展治理“壮阳”广告专项行动[J].现代经济信息,2006(8):42-43.
-
6紫水.商场小把戏[J].齐鲁质量,2003(8):29-29.
-
7李美珍.浅谈高铁征地拆迁确权审计风险及应对[J].中国经贸,2013(4):230-232.
-
8杨建军.采用欺骗手段应聘司机后占有驾驶车辆如何定性[J].中国检察官,2010(6):67-67.
-
9吴新华.“擦边球”也犯规[J].中华商标,2001(1):13-14.
-
10国家工商总局认定驰名商标228件[J].中华商标,2008(4):33-38.
