期刊文献+

粘性土中桥墩基础局部冲刷计算方法对比分析 被引量:6

Analysis of the calculation methods of local scour depth around bridge pier in clays
下载PDF
导出
摘要 桥墩基础局部冲刷研究多针对砂性土,相对于砂性土,粘性土的冲刷速度要慢得多,目前的研究较少地涉及到粘性土。近年来粘性土冲刷特性研究逐渐受到国内外学者的重视,粘性土中桥墩基础局部冲刷深度的计算方法主要有中国《公路工程水文勘测设计规范》方法(简称"中国公路规范方法")和美国SRICOS-EFA方法。本文通过典型算例的对比,分析了两种方法的计算结果及其各自特点。相比之下,中国公路规范方法的计算公式较为简单,但该方法仅能计算出桥墩基础的最大冲刷深度,并且忽略了一些重要的影响因素。本文通过典型算例的对比分析,对中国公路规范方法提出了一些改进建议。 Most of the current studies of local scour at piers are aimed at sandy soils. Comparison with sandy soils, the scour speed in cohesive soils is much slower. Only few researches are related to cohesive soils. Some researchers have paid attention to the scour behavior of clays. This paper mainly introduced the methods of pier scour in cohesive material. One the methods is the Hydrologic Reconnaissance Design Specification of Highway Construction in China, and the other is the SRICOS-EFA method used in USA. Characteristics of these methods are compared using some typical examples. The former calculation method is relatively simple. However, the method can only be used to calculate the maximum scour depth of the pier foundation, and it ignores the influence of some important factors. Some improvement suggestions are put forward through comparison analysis of some typical examples.
出处 《水文地质工程地质》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期37-43,共7页 Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41172246) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2013CB036304) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
关键词 局部冲刷深度 桥墩基础 对比分析 EFA试验 冲刷曲线 local scour depth piers foundation comparison analysis EF A tests scour curves
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Arneson L A, Zevenbergen L W, Lagasse P F, et al. Evaluating scour at bridge ( Fifth Edition ) [ R ]. US Department of Transportation FHWA, April 2012.
  • 2Wardhana K, Hadipriono F C. Analysis of recent bridge failure in the United States [ J ]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 2003, 17(3) :144 - 150.
  • 3Melville B W, Coleman S E. Bridge Scour [ M ]. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA, 2000.
  • 4JTGC30-2002,公路工程水文勘测设计规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2002.
  • 5Briaud J L, Chen H C, Chang K A, et al. Summary Report of the SRICOS-EFA Method [ R ]. Texas A&M University, 2011.
  • 6Liang F Y, Bennett C R, Parsons R L, et al. A literature review on behavior of scoured piles under bridges [ C ]/! In: the 2009 International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo, Orlando, GSPI$6, ASCE, 2009 ..482 - 459.
  • 7Briaud J L, Ting F C K, Chen H C, et al. Erosion function apparatus for scour rate predictions [ J ]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 2001, and Environmental 127(2) :105 - 113.
  • 8Moody L F. Friction factors for pipe flow [ J ]. Transaction of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1944, 66(8) : 671 -684.
  • 9Nurtjahyo. Chimera RNAS simulations of pier scour and contraction scour in cohesive soils [ D ]. TX: Texas A&M University, College Station, 2003.
  • 10Briaud J L, Chen H C, Li Y, et al. SRICOS-EFA Method for Complex Piers in Fine-Grained Soils [ J ]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(11) : 1180 - 1191.

共引文献7

同被引文献105

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部