期刊文献+

环保公共开支、资本化程度与经济增长 被引量:8

Environmental Public Expenditure,Capitalization and Economic Growth
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要从环境保护公共开支之资本化程度的角度,探讨环境保护与经济增长间的关系。在环境保护方面的公共开支欲对经济增长发挥积极作用并形成诸如环境库兹涅茨曲线的后半段曲线,其决定性条件便是环保公共开支在资本化上的程度如何。通过构建基于经济增长模型的理论框架,可以发现,当环保公共开支资本化程度高于其他部门(譬如私人投资部门)水平时,环保公共开支便会有利于经济的增长,从而验证了环境库兹涅茨曲线的有关结论,即在经过顶部后,经济与环境出现同步改善的情况。反之,当环保公共开支资本化程度低于其他部门的水平时,前者会对经济增长造成不利影响,出现挤出效应,拖累经济增长。此外,本文还进一步剖析了在预算约束条件下,环保公共开支有利于经济增长的资本化条件。 Previous research has proved that the public expenditure for the purpose of protecting environment would damage economic growth. This paper recognizes that it is environmental public expenditure which brings the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Although the consumptive sector of the environmental public expenditure creates negative impact on economic growth, the productive sector of which could support the economy and improve efficiency positively. The economy could obtain its sustainahility if such productive sector is encouraged. Additionally this analysis proved the public environmental expenditure would benefit the economic development only of the ratio of public environmental expenditure of GDP is greater than its counterpart, which comes mainly from private sector. Finally this research also takes into account the factor of budget constrain, which would change the relationship between public environmental expenditure and economic growth.
作者 李志青
出处 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期159-164,共6页 Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
基金 上海市浦江人才项目资助课题(项目批准号:13PJC012)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 环保投资 资本化 经济增长 environmental investment capitalization economic growth
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Aschauer, D.A. " Is Public Expenditure Productive?" ffoumal o[ Monetary Eeonomirs 23 (1989 ) : 177 -200.
  • 2G.M. Gro-sman, "A. B. Knleger, Economic Growth and the Environment," Q. J. Econ. 110 (1995) : 353-377.
  • 3Daxid Pearce and Charles Palmer., "Public and Private Spending for Environmental Protection: A Cross-Country Policy Analysis," ed. l)avid Miles et al., -[he Economics qf Public Spending ( Oxf-rd University Press, 2002 ).
  • 4【美]弗里曼著:《环境与资源价值评估》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002年.
  • 5G. Garrod and K. Willis, Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 1999).
  • 6J. Buchanan and G. Tullock, "Polluters" Profit and Political Response: Direct Controls Versus Taxes," American Economic Review65(1975) : 139 -47.
  • 7R Coase, "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics 3 ( 1960 ) : 1 - 44.
  • 8R. Morgenstem, W. Pizer and J. S. Shih, "Are We Overstating the Real Economic Costs of Environmental Protection?" Washington DC, Resoum'fi-r the Future (1997) : Discussion Paper no. 97-36 R_EV.
  • 9M. Poter, "The Competitive Advantage of Nations," Harvard Business Review, March/April (1990) : 73 -95.
  • 10S. Schaltegger, P,. Burritt, Contemporary Environmental Accounting. Issues, Concepts and Practice ( Sheffield : Greenleaf, 2000 ).

二级参考文献3

共引文献12

同被引文献104

引证文献8

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部