德国“习明纳尔”对美国大学建立初期历史学专业化的影响被引量：2

On German Historical Seminar's Influences upon the Historical Professionalization in American Universities

导出

摘要本文试图从整体上呈现德国历史学"习明纳尔"对美国历史学专业化初期的影响。在对"习明纳尔"做了概念上的界定,勾勒了它在德国的发展之后,本文简述了美国留学生将其带回新大陆并使其在刚成立的各大学中生根发芽的历程。由于对兰克的思想在认识上存在偏废,所以他们更侧重"习明纳尔"的教学方法,而非德国史家本有的内部精神。美国学者认同并追奉了兰克的客观主义,通过传播"习明纳尔"这种新的教学方式,促进了美国的历史学专业化。 This article tries to provide an overview on the German historical seminar＇s influences upon the historical professionalization when the American universities were established. After outlining the German historical seminar＇s development, this paper describes the process that the American o- versee students brought the new teaching and research method back to their own country. Due to they did not completely apprehend the inner spirit of seminar, they paid more attention to the teaching method aspect, and thus a kind of objectivism approach was broad-casted and taught by seminars ,which enhanced the professionalization of history in America.

作者孙琇

机构地区山东师范大学历史与社会发展学院

出处《历史教学（下半月）》 CSSCI 2014年第3期63-67,共5页 History Teaching

关键词习明纳尔美国大学历史学专业化 Seminar, American Universities, Historical Professionalization

分类号 G649.712 [文化科学—高等教育学] K0-4 [历史地理—历史学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Walter Prescott Webb, The Historical Seminar. Its Outer Shell and Its Inner Spirit, The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, Vol. 42, No. 1. (Jun., 1955), p.10.
2Walter Prescott Webb, The Historical Seminar. Its Outer Shell and Its Inner Spirit, p.lO.
3Walter Prescott Webb, The Historical Seminar. Its Outer Shell and Its Inner Spirit, p.3.
4刘宝存.美国研究型大学一年级习明纳尔课程[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(3):64-68. 被引量：47
5王凤玉.“习明纳”:高等学校的成功教学组织形式[J].辽宁教育研究,2006(8):73-75. 被引量：29
6Lenore O'Boyle, Learning for Its Own Sake, The Gernug University as Nineteenth-Century Model, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol.25, No.lOan., 1983), p.3.
7陈洪捷.《德国古典大学官的经典文献.洪堡论大学》,《德国古典大学观及其对中国的影响》(修订版),北京.北京大学出版社,2006年,第29-31页.
8Walter Prescott Webb, The Historical Seminar, Its Outer Shell and Its Inner Spirit, p.5.
9乔治·皮博迪·古奇.《十九世纪历史学和历史学家》(上册),耿淡如译,北京.商务印书馆,1989年,第228-229页.
10Peter Novick, That Noble Dream.the Objectivity Question and the American Historical Profession, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press,1988, p.26.

二级参考文献11

1The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. P,.einventing Undergraduate Education:Three Years After the Boyer Report[EB/OL].http://www.sunysb.edu/pres/0210066-Boyer% 20P,.e-port%20Final.pdf, 2003-10-28/2004-05-04.
2The Freshman Seminar Office.The Freshman Seminar[EB/OL]. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/%7Eseminars/fs,2003-06-08/2004-05 -04.
3Freshman & Sophomore Seminars at Berkeley[EB/OL].http://fss.berkeley.edu/index.html, 2002 -09 -04/2004 -05-04.
4Duke University. FOCUS:First-year Opportunity for Comprehensive,Unified Study [EB/OL]. http://pmac.aas.duke.edu/focus/.2004- 03- 27/ 2004-05-04.
5Professional Schools Seminar Program[EB/OL]. http://www.college.ucla.edu/up/pssp/, 2004 -04 - 12/ 2004-05-04.
6Duke University .Excerpts from 2003 end-of-term surveys [EB/OL]. http://pmac.aas.duke.edu/focus/comments.html, 2004-03-27/2004-05-17.
7Levine,Arthur and John Weingart. Reform of Undergraduate Education [ M ]. San Francisco :Jossey-Bass, 1973.29-30.
8美国高质量高教育研究小组.投身学习:发挥美国高等教育的潜力[A].教育发展与政策研究中心.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势[C].北京:人民教育出版社,1986.52.
9李三虎.近代德国大学"讨论班"制度探源[J].自然辩证法通讯,1992,(6).
10李均.习明纳:历史考察与现实借鉴[J].石油教育,1996,0(10):62-64. 被引量：22