期刊文献+

The Status of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine in the United States 被引量:1

The Status of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine in the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 Since its first mention in U.S. media in the early 1970s, the practiceof acupuncture and Oriental medicine (AOM) has grown in stature from a fringe,counter-culture movement to a valid, evidenced-based treatment option for patients.In the last 40 years, AOM schools and colleges have been accredited by the U.S.Department of Education, offering both masters and doctoral degree programs. Todate, forty-seven states and the District of Columbia license or certify acupuncturistsbased on competency proven through state examination or professional certificationby the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine(NCCAOM). As acceptance of AOM in the U.S. has increased through both theassurance of psychometrically sound certification and the education of the Americanpublic on this topic, many challenges have emerged. Problems such as theunderemployment of AOM clinicians, methodological hurdles for the investigation of mechanisms, and efficacyof acupuncture and other AOM treatment techniques have been observed. Investigative challenges also includegaps in research training as well as a dearth of the basic resources needed to conduct randomized controlledtrials (RCTs). As AOM research has sought integration into the Western research model, problems have beenidentified in the design of AOMRCTs, and strategies for their resolution through methods such as translationalresearch have been examined. Incorporating these strategies as well as efficacy, effectiveness, and qualitativemeasures will strengthen the evidence base and thus provide clinical decision makers with more tools that canbe used to design patient treatment regimens. Since its first mention in U.S. media in the early 1970s, the practiceof acupuncture and Oriental medicine (AOM) has grown in stature from a fringe,counter-culture movement to a valid, evidenced-based treatment option for patients.In the last 40 years, AOM schools and colleges have been accredited by the U.S.Department of Education, offering both masters and doctoral degree programs. Todate, forty-seven states and the District of Columbia license or certify acupuncturistsbased on competency proven through state examination or professional certificationby the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine(NCCAOM). As acceptance of AOM in the U.S. has increased through both theassurance of psychometrically sound certification and the education of the Americanpublic on this topic, many challenges have emerged. Problems such as theunderemployment of AOM clinicians, methodological hurdles for the investigation of mechanisms, and efficacyof acupuncture and other AOM treatment techniques have been observed. Investigative challenges also includegaps in research training as well as a dearth of the basic resources needed to conduct randomized controlledtrials (RCTs). As AOM research has sought integration into the Western research model, problems have beenidentified in the design of AOMRCTs, and strategies for their resolution through methods such as translationalresearch have been examined. Incorporating these strategies as well as efficacy, effectiveness, and qualitativemeasures will strengthen the evidence base and thus provide clinical decision makers with more tools that canbe used to design patient treatment regimens.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine》 SCIE CAS 2014年第4期243-249,共7页 中国结合医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 ACUPUNCTURE Oriental medicine STATUS RESEARCH United States CHALLENGES acupuncture Oriental medicine status research United States challenges
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献13

同被引文献18

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部