期刊文献+

1.8mm同轴微切口白内障超声乳化术对角膜散光的影响 被引量:7

Effect of 1.8mm coaxial micro-incision cataract phacoemulsification on corneal astigmatism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察1.8 mm同轴微切口白内障超声乳化术对角膜散光的影响,并与传统3.2 mm小切口白内障超声乳化手术进行比较。 方法:年龄相关性白内障患者160例168眼,年龄50~83岁,晶状体混浊分级为Ⅱ~Ⅴ级,随机分为两组,每组84眼,分别行1.8mm同轴微切口(微切口组)和传统3.2mm小切口(常规组)白内障超声乳化手术,术后第1 d;1 wk;1 mo观察随访,记录裸眼视力及散光改变,采用χ2检验和t检验对所得数据进行分析。 结果:术后第1d;1wk;1mo微切口组裸眼视力≥0.5者分别占79%,83%,94%,常规组裸眼视力≥0.5者分别占46%,64%,85%,两组差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);术后第1d,微切口组平均角膜散光为0.75±0.45D,常规组角膜散光为1.12±0.55D,两组比较有显著性差异( P<0.01),术后1wk和1mo,微切口组平均角膜散光分别为0.76±0.40D和0.65±0.35D,常规组平均角膜散光为1.05±0.53D和0.85±0.43D,两组比较有统计学意义( P<0.05)。 结论:1.8 mm同轴微切口白内障超声乳化术较常规超声乳化术,术源性角膜散光更小,术后视力恢复更快。 AIM: To observe the effect of 1.8mm coaxial micro-incision cataract phacoemulsification on corneal astigmatism, and compared with the effect of traditional 3.2mm small incision cataract phacoemulsification . METHODS: Totally 160 patients ( 168 eyes ) with age-related cataract were selected, whose age from 50 to 83 years old.Their lens opacities classification was Ⅱ-Ⅴgrade.Two groups were divided randomly and each group included 84 eyes.They performed 1.8mm coaxial micro-incision ( micro-vision group ) and traditional 3.2mm small incision ( control group ) of cataract phacoemulsification respectively. After 1d, 1wk, 1mo follow-up, their naked vision and astigmatism changes were recorded.The χ2-test and t-test was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: After 1d, 1wk, 1mo of the micro-incision surgery, naked vision ≥0.5 of the patients were 79%, 83% and 94% respectively. In control group, naked vision ≥0.5 were 46%, 64% and 85% respecticvely. There was significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05).The average corneal astigmatism of micro-incision group was 0.75 ±0.45D on 1d after surgery, and that of the control group was 1.12 ±0.55D.There were significant difference between two groups ( P〈0.01 ). After 1wk and 1mo, the average corneal astigmatism of micro incision group was 0.76 ±0.40D and 0.65 ±0.35D, and the average corneal astigmatism of control group was 1.05±0.53D and 0.85 ±0.43D.The two groups were statistically significant (P〈0.05). CONCUSION: The corneal astigmatism of 1.8mm coaxial micro-incision cataract phacoemulsification was smaller than that of the conventional phacoemulsification and visual recovery was also better after surgery.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期670-672,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 微切口 超声乳化 角膜散光 micro -incision phacoemulsification corneal astigmatism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1蒋宇振,罗莉霞,刘玉华,吴明星,张新愉,刘奕志.双手微切口白内障超声乳化术的超声能量应用研究[J].眼科研究,2005,23(5):528-531. 被引量:3
  • 2朱思泉,刘宁朴,王宁利,陈辉.双手微切口白内障超声乳化手术的初步临床应用[J].眼科,2006,15(1):24-27. 被引量:6
  • 3赵晓辉,邢怡桥,陈樱.双手微小切口白内障超声乳化术的临床疗效观察[J].眼视光学杂志,2006,8(5):318-320. 被引量:9
  • 4张广斌,陈伟,毛祖红.微小切口晶状体超声乳化吸出术应用价值[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2006,28(11):817-819. 被引量:8
  • 5Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Agarwal A. Phakonit: a new technology of removing cataract through a 0.9ram incision[M]// Agarwal S, Agarwal A,Saehdcv MS, etal. Phacoemulsification, laser cataract surgery and foldable IOLs. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers. 1998: 139-143.
  • 6Kehnan CD. History of phacoemulsification[M]// Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Saehdey MS, et al. Phaeoemulsifieation, laser cataract surgery and foldable IOLs. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers. 1998:1-8.
  • 7Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, et al. Phakonit: pha- coemulsification through a 0.9 mm corneal incision [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,27(10):1548-1552.
  • 8Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Agarwal A, et al. Phakonit-lens removal through a 0.9 mm incision [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 ,27(10): 1531-1533.
  • 9Agarwal A, Agarwal S. Agarwal A, et al. Phakonit with an AcriTec IOL[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2003,29(4) : 854-855.
  • 10Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Ultrasonic phacoemulsificalion using a 1.4 mm incision:clinical results [J]. J Cataract Refracl Surg, 2002,28(1 ) : 81-86.

共引文献84

同被引文献67

  • 1吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:174
  • 2Hayashi K, Yoshida M,Hayashi H. Poslopetrative coraeal shapechanges : micmruincision versus small-incision catarant surgery [J].J Calatract Refract Surg,2009 ,35 (2) :233 -239.
  • 3Wang Y,Xia Y,Liu X,et al. Comparison of bimanual and microco-axial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound[ J]. Acta Oph-thalmol,2012,90(2) :184 - 187.
  • 4Ang RE,Reyes KB,Hernandez JA,et al. Wavefront-guided epitheliallaser in situ keratomileusis with mitomycin-C for myopia and my-opic astigmatism : flap-on versus flap-off technique [ J ]. J CataractRefract Surg,2011,37(6) :1133 -1139.
  • 5Ali6 JL,Pinero DP,Ortiz D,et al. Clinical outcomes and postopera-tive intraocular optical quality with a microincision aberration-freeaspheric intraocular lens [ J] . J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35(9):1548-1554.
  • 6Can I,Takmaz T, Yildiz Y, et al. Conxial,microcoaxial,and biaxialmicroincision cataract surgery: pro-spective comparatine study [J]. JCataract Refract Surg,2010,36(5) :740 -746.
  • 7Fong CS,Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, et al. Sustainability of visual a-cuity in the first 2 years after cataract surgery [ J ]. Br J Ophthalmol,2011,95(12):1652 -1655.
  • 8Wang J,Zhang EK,Fan WY,et al. The effect of micro-incision andsmall-incision coaxial phaco-emulsification on comeal astigmatism[I]. Clin. Experiment Ophthalmol,2009 ,37(7) :664 -669.
  • 9Wilczynski M,Supady E,Piotr L,et al. Comparison of surgically in-duced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1. 8mmmicroincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1. 7 mmmicroincision[ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2009 ,35(9) : 1563.
  • 10George R,Rupauiha P,Sripriya AV,et al.Comparison ofendothelial cell loss and surg ically induced astigma tism following convention alextracapsular catract surgery,manual small-incision surgery and phacoemulsification[J].Ophthamlic Epidemiol,2005,12(5):293-297.

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部