期刊文献+

古希腊时期主要修辞学派的修辞批评视角

Perspectives of Major Ancient Greek Rhetorical Schools in the Practice of Rhetorical Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在古希腊时期,以苏格拉底和柏拉图为代表的哲学派从伦理、真理、知识、正义等角度出发,对以高尔吉亚和普罗塔哥拉为代表的诡辩派以及他们的诡辩修辞提出了批判,在批判中逐渐形成修辞批评的伦理视角。诡辩家则对哲学家提出了反批评,并指出了哲学家表面追求真理和正义,其实同时也是通过迎合受众来追求名誉,从而形成了修辞批评的或然性视角。亚里斯多德则从技术的角度对诡辩家和诡辩修辞提出了分析,并在这种分析中形成了修辞批评的技术分析视角。 In ancient Greece, as the representatives of philosophical school, Socrates and Plato intensively criticized Gor- gias and Protagoras, who were the representatives of sophists. Philosophers conducted their criticism with philosophical val- ues and criteria like ethics, truth, justice and knowledge; and they gradually developed an ethical perspective of rhetorical criticism. As a counterstrike, sophists brought forth anti-criticism against philosophers, pointing out that philosophers seemingly alleged to pursue truth and justice while they virtually sought name and fame by catering to audience's preference. In this process, sophists gradually developed a probable perspective of rhetorical criticism. Finally, after a technical analysis on sophists and their sophistic rhetoric, Aristotle developed a technical-analytic perspective of rhetorical criticism.
作者 周念哲
出处 《三明学院学报》 2014年第1期29-33,共5页 Journal of Sanming University
基金 三明学院科研基金项目(A201216/Q) 福建省教育厅教育科研项目(JB13228S)
关键词 古希腊 修辞学派 修辞批评 诡辩家 柏拉图 亚里斯多德 ancient Greece rhetorical schools rhetorical criticism sophists Plato Aristotle
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王志伟.当代西方修辞批评方法:多元性及其理据[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2013,36(4):6-9. 被引量:7
  • 2袁影.中西修辞批评:渊源与特征简论[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(6):58-61. 被引量:7
  • 3Herrick, James A. The History and Theory of Rhetoric[M]. Needham Heights: AUyn & Bacon, 2001.
  • 4Kennedy', George A. A New History of Classical Rhetoric [M]. Princeton University Perss, 1994.
  • 5邓志勇.修辞批评的戏剧主义范式略论[J].修辞学习,2007(2):36-40. 被引量:36
  • 6[美]肯尼斯·博克.当代西方修辞学:演讲与话语批评[M].常昌富,顾宝桐,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
  • 7Marina McCoy. Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists [M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,2008.
  • 8Schiappa, Edward. Protagoros and Logos: A Study in Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric [M].University of South Carolina Press, 2003.
  • 9Kennedy, George A. Aristotle On Rhetoric : A Theory of Civic Discourse [M]. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

二级参考文献58

  • 1高万云.文学的修辞批评之中西比较[J].湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,25(1):54-60. 被引量:5
  • 2袁影.当代西方修辞批评研究:格局与走向[J].修辞学习,2007(4):40-43. 被引量:10
  • 3Black, Edwin. Rhetorical Ctiticism: A Study in Method [M]. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.
  • 4Brock, Bernard L. et al. Methods of Rhetorical criticism: A Twenty-Century Perspectives [M] 3^rd ed. Wayne State University Press, 1990.
  • 5Burgchardt. Carl R. ed. Readings in Rhetorical Criticism [M] . State College, Penn.: Strata Publishing Company, 1995.
  • 6Burks, Don M. Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Literature: An Exploration [M] . West Lafayette, In. : Purdue University Press, 1978.
  • 7Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motive [M]. Berkeley: University of Callfomia Press, 1969.
  • 8Burke, Kenneth. Attitude Toward History [M] . Boston: Beacon Press, 1961.
  • 9Burke, Kenneth, The Rhetoric of Religion: Strdies in Logology [M] . Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970.
  • 10Burde, Kenneth. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose [M] . Berkeley: University of California Press, 1935.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部