期刊文献+

替吉奥治疗晚期胃癌有效性和安全性的系统评价 被引量:18

Efficacy and safety of S-1 for advanced gastric cancer:a systematic review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:系统分析替吉奥治疗晚期胃癌的有效性、安全性,以期做出客观可信的评价,指导临床用药。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、Elsevier、CNKI、中文生物医学会议文献数据库,纳入替吉奥或替吉奥联合铂类治疗晚期胃癌的随机或半随机对照试验(RTC),采用RevMan5.2软件进行方法学质量评价和统计分析。结果:纳入10个RTC,替吉奥可显著提高药物对晚期胃癌患者的病情控制率[OR=1.9,95%CI(1.27,2.85),P=0.002];联合胃癌术后给药与单独手术比较,替吉奥显著提高晚期胃癌患者三年存活率(P=0.000 2)和五年存活率(P=0.002);显著降低术后复发率;在药物安全性方面,替吉奥在治疗过程中能显著降低化疗引起的血液系统的严重不良反应,对降低消化系统严重不良反应(以呕吐腹泻为代表进行分析)和其他严重不良反应(以化疗性口腔炎为代表)方面无显著性差异。结论:与其他化疗药物比较,替吉奥治疗晚期胃癌总体疗效肯定,在有效缓解控制临床症状的同时能减轻患者血液系统方面的不良反应,改善患者生活质量;联合术后给药与单独手术比较,替吉奥能显著提高患者术后存活率,降低术后复发率,是治疗晚期胃癌的优选方案。 OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of S-1 in treating advanced gastric cancer. METHODS The Co- chrane library, MEDLINE, Elsevier, CNKI databases were searched, randomized controlled trails(RCT) about S1 for advanced gastric cancer were evaluated and analyzed by RevMan5.2. RESULTS 10 RCTs were enrolled in the Meta-analysis. The S-1 group had a higher the disease control rate than the control group [OR = 1.9, 95 %CI(1.27,2. 85), P = 0. 0021. Compared with the surgery-only group, the S-1 group had a higher rate of overall survival at 3 years (P = 0. 0002) and at 5 years (P = 0. 002) than in the surgery-only group. Significant safety advantages were observed in the 8-1 group, the hematological system ( grade 3/4) in the incidence of adverse reactions significant decreased comparing with the control group. There were no significant differences at digestive system, stomatitis in the incidence of adverse reactions. CONCLUSION S-1 showed good efficacy in the treatment advanced gastric carcinoma, and the adverse reactions were relatively mild. So S1 is the better choice for the treat- ment of advanced gastric cancer.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期552-558,共7页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金 湖北省教育厅科学技术研究项目(编号:B2013276)
关键词 晚期胃癌 替吉奥 循证研究 advanced gastric cancer S-1 systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F,Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61:69-90.
  • 2Archie V, Kauh J,Jones DV, et al. Gastric cancer: standards for the 21st century[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2006, 57: 123-131.
  • 3Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? [J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996,17:1-12.
  • 4马培奇.抗肿瘤新药替吉奥钾研究进展[J].中国医药导刊,2007,9(6):499-502. 被引量:54
  • 5Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-l, an oral fluoropyrim- idine[J]. New Engl J Med, 2007,357:1810-1820.
  • 6Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase Ⅲ trial comparing adjuvant chemothera- py with S-I versus surgery alone in stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ gastric canc er[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011,29: 4387-4393.
  • 7Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, et al. Multicenter phase Ⅲ comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional flu- orouraci) in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcino- ma study., the FLAGS trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010,28: 1547- 1553.
  • 8Kim GM,Jeung HC, Rha SY, et al. A randomized phase Ⅱ trial of S-l-oxaliplatin versus eapecitabine-oxaliplatin in ad- vanced gastric eancer[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012,48:518-526.
  • 9刘莉,郑盈,张智勇,丁昌利,陆震宇.替吉奥单药口服治疗老年晚期胃癌的临床观察[J].实用癌症杂志,2011,26(3):294-296. 被引量:65
  • 10王晓红,王剑英,王丽萍,黄颖.替吉奥一线治疗晚期胃癌临床观察[J].疾病监测与控制,2011,5(7):401-403. 被引量:1

二级参考文献54

  • 1余传定,王新保.胃癌新辅助化疗研究进展[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(11):720-723. 被引量:19
  • 2Cunningham D,Allum WH,Stenning SP,菅鑫妍.手术期间化学疗法与单独手术治疗可切除的胃食管癌疗效比较[J].中国处方药,2006,5(8):59-60. 被引量:435
  • 3秦叔逵,龚新雷.晚期胃癌化疗的现状和新进展[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(9):641-652. 被引量:268
  • 4李俊.乳腺癌的新辅助化疗[J].国外医学(外科学分册),1997,24(1):29-31. 被引量:16
  • 5Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0 : development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment [ J]. Semin Radiat Oncol,2003 ; 13 ( 3 ) : 176-81.
  • 6Koizumi W, Kurihara M, Nakano S, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral derivative of 5-fluorouracil,in advanced gastric cancer [ J ]. Oneology,2000 ;58 (3) :191-7.
  • 7Jin ML,Lu HS,Li J,et al. Randomized 3-armed phase III study of S-1 monotherapy versus S-1/CDDP ( SP ) versus 5-FU/CDDP ( FP ) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer ( AGC ) : SC -101 study [ J ]. Proc ASCO ,2008 ;26:221.
  • 8Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T,et al. S-1 plus cisplatin alone versus S-1 alone for first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer ( SPIRITS trial : a Phase Ⅲ tiral ) [ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2008 ; 9:215.
  • 9Kang Y,Kang WK,Shin DB,et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of capecitabine / cisplatin vs continuous infusion of 5-FU / cisplatin as first line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer:efficacy and safety results[J]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2006;24:183.
  • 10Mizoshita T, Kataoka H, Kubota E, et al. Gastric phenotype signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach with multiple bone metastases effectively treated with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2008, 13(4) :373-376.

共引文献282

同被引文献134

引证文献18

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部