期刊文献+

政府工程多属性招投标博弈分析 被引量:5

A Game Analysis Based on Multi-attribute Bidding of Government Project
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一些大型或技术复杂的政府工程确定赢标人时除投标价格因素外,还将质量、工期等因素纳入考虑。为此,文章将政府工程招投标时招标人、竞标人的参与选择过程视为一个要约、承诺和定标的三阶段动态博弈,并构建了政府工程多属性招投标非合作动态博弈模型。然后将投标价格视为竞标质量和工期的函数,求出了投标人的最优竞标战略。通过分析发现投标质量和提前工期分别超过某点后,投标人的收益分别是其投标质量和提前工期的增函数,而在到达该点之前,投标质量和提前工期边际收益递减;招标人的投标承诺质量和提前工期偏好系数越大,竞标人的收益越高,其结果是招标人故意夸大其质量、工期偏好系数,以诱导竞标人投标,增大招标剩余。最后通过算例验证了模型的有效性。 Determining the winning bidder of some major or technically complex government project is not only the price, bat also the quality and duration etc. So, the paper regards the selection process of government project tenderee and bidder as a three-stage dynamic game of offer, commitment and evaluation, and to build a non-coop- erative and dynamic game model based on multi-attribute government project bidding, and then to consider the price of a function of quality and duration, to find out the optimal bidding strategy of bidder. The analysis turns up that the quality and advanced time respectively after reach one point, the bidder' s earnings are a rise function of quality and advance time, and then the bidder' s earnings would be a decrease function if it before reaches the point. The bidder' s earnings would be much more if the preferences coefficient is much greater of quality and ad- vance time by which tenderee promises, so to gain more bidding surplus, the tenderee would exaggerate the preferences coefficient of quality and advance times. At last, this paper verifies the validity of the model by using exampies.
作者 吕炜 贺昌政
机构地区 四川大学商学院
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期64-72,共9页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 政府工程 非合作博弈 多属性 招投标 博弈 government project non-cooperative game multi-attribute bidding game
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献72

  • 1张醒洲,张学娟.多属性采购拍卖的价值函数与打分规则[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(S1):137-141. 被引量:8
  • 2陈剑,黄河.基于树型结构的在线逆向组合拍卖模型[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004,13(4):310-315. 被引量:13
  • 3Teich J E, Wallenius H, Wallenius J, et al. Emerging multiple issue e-auctions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159 (1): 1 16.
  • 4Bichler M. An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auction[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29: 249-268.
  • 5Chen-Ritzo C, Harrison T, Wasnica M K, et al. Better, faster, cheaper: A multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(12): 1753-1762.
  • 6Che Y K. Design competition through multidimensional auctions[J]. Journal of Economics, 1993, 24: 668-680.
  • 7Branco F. The design of multidimensional auctions[J]. Journal of Economics, 1997, 28(1): 63- 81.
  • 8Parkes D C, Kalagnanam J. Iterative multi-attribute vickrey auctions[J]. Management Science, 2004, Special Issue on Electronic Markets.
  • 9David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S. Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attributes auctions[C]// Proc of the 1st Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Bologna, Italy, 2002: 77-85.
  • 10David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S. An English auction protocol for multi-attributes items[C]// Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce: IV. Designing Mechanisms and Systems, LNAI, 2002, 2531: 5288.

共引文献73

同被引文献55

  • 1张金强,戴国忠,谢延东.项目管理系统的数据模型研究[J].计算机工程与设计,2005,26(5):1125-1127. 被引量:3
  • 2Thiel S E. Multidimensional auctions[J]. Economics Letters, 1988,28 (1) : 37 - 40.
  • 3Asker J0 Cantillon E. Properties of scoring auctions[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2008,39 (1) : 69-85.
  • 4Che Y K. Design competition through multi- dimensional auctions [J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1993,24(12) : 668- 680.
  • 5Branco F. The design of multidimensional auctions [J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1997,28 (1) : 63-81.
  • 6David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S. Bidding in sealed-bid and English multi-attribute auctions[J].Decision Support Systems, 2006,42 (2) : 527- 556.
  • 7Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game theory [M]. MIT Press, 1991:
  • 8Cheng H H, Tan G F. Asymmetric common-value auctions with applications to private-value auctionswith resale [J]. Economic Theory, 2010,45 (1 - 2) : 253-290.
  • 9Ching-Hua, Chen-Ritzo. Better,faster,cheaper: A multi-attribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback [J].Management Science, 2005,51 (12) : 1753- 1762.
  • 10郑锦荣,徐福缘.同质条件下招投标双方的博弈[J].系统管理学报,2008,17(1):51-55. 被引量:4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部