期刊文献+

评中国对CISG非书面形式规定保留的理论和实践——以中国撤回该项保留为契机 被引量:1

Comment on the Theory and Practice of China's Reservation on the Provisions Related to Non-written Form in CISG——Based on China's Withdrawing the Reservation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国在核准CISG时对该公约关于合同非书面形式的规定予以保留。现行《合同法》规定合同可以非书面形式订立。为此,理论界对于中国当事方是否仍应以书面形式订立国际货物买卖合同,以及中国应否撤回该项保留有激烈的讨论。中国的法院和仲裁机构对理论论争保持不予回应的态度,并发展出两种立场:其一为依最密切联系原则适用中国法,其二为径自适用CISG第11条等合同形式条款,该两种做法都存在缺陷。中国对CISG的此项保留,发生该公约关于合同非书面形式的规定被排除适用的效果,具体准据法应依据冲突规范予以确定。近期中国已经撤回该项保留,中国当事方将毫无争议地以非书面形式订立国际货物买卖合同。据此,该项撤回必将促进中国的实践部门积极适用CISG,中国有望成为研究CISG的中心。 China has made a reservation on the provisions related to non-written form in CISG when approving the convention. Chinese uniform contract law provides:parties may conclude contracts with non-written form. Consequently, the reservation has raised the argument whether Chinese parties should still conclude contracts of international sale of goods with written form, and whether it is time to withdraw it. Chinese courts and arbitra- tion tribunals don't respond to such heated academic debates, but with two standpoints developed one states that Chinese law should be applied according to the most significant relationship principle in private interna- tional law;the other holds that CISG, including article 11, should be applied. Both have serious defects. Chinese reservation has the effect of excluding the provisions related to non-written form from being applied in Sino-for- eign sale of goods contracts. The applicable law shall be determined according to the conflict rules. Recently China has withdrawn the reservation,which has come into effect. Chinese parties may conclude contract of in- ternational sale of goods with non-written form with certainty. The withdrawal will promote Chinese practice branch to apply CISG actively. China is expected to become the research center of CISG.
作者 赵玉意
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 北大核心 2014年第2期173-179,共7页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词 国际货物买卖合同 非书面形式 保留 CISG contract of international sale of goods non-written form reservation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献40

  • 1Ulrich G. Schroeter.2004.The Status of Hong, kong and Macao Under the United Nations Convention On Contracts For the Intematianal Sale of Goods[J]. Pace International Law Rewiew(X Ⅵ).
  • 2《维也纳条约法公约》(英文作准本)第2条(d)款.
  • 3Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law. China(PRC) [EB/OL]. http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/countries/cntries-China.html.
  • 4《公约》第1条第(1)款(b)项.
  • 52007年《最高人民法院关于审理涉外民事或商事合同纠纷案件法律适用若干问题的规定》第3条.
  • 6Dicey and Morris. The Conflict of Laws (13th ed. 2000) [M]. Sweet & Maxwell.
  • 7Jonathan Hill. International Commercial Disputes in English Courts (2005) [ M]. Hart Publishing.
  • 8H. U. J. D'Oliveira. "Characteristic Obligation" in the Draft EEC Obligation Convention [J]. 25 Am. J. Comp. L. 303 (1977).
  • 9Peter Nygh. Autonomy in International Contracts (1999) [ M]. Clarendon Press.
  • 10[美]西蒙尼德斯 宋晓译 黄进校.20世纪末的国际私法-进步还是退步.民商法论丛,2002,(3).

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部