期刊文献+

EPFN与PFNA Ⅱ治疗股骨转子间骨折的效果比较 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较股骨近端膨胀髓内钉(EPFN)与亚洲型股骨近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉(PFNAⅡ)治疗股骨转子间骨折的效果。方法对86例股骨转子间骨折患者行闭合复位内固定术,回顾分析获得随访的56例患者的临床资料,根据术中使用内固定情况分为EPFN组(26例)和PFNAⅡ组(30例),术后随访(18.6±?)个月,并对两组术中操作不当发生率及术后并发症发生情况、手术时间、术中出血量,术后下地时间、骨折临床愈合时间及髋关节Harris评分进行对比。结果两组患者均未发生切口感染、股骨头切割或坏死、下肢深静脉血栓形成及明显髋内、外翻畸形等并发症,术后髋关节功能恢复良好,术后下地时间、骨折临床愈合时间、髋关节Harris评分两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PFNAⅡ组较EPFN组术中操作不当及术后大腿疼痛发生率低,手术时间短,术中出血量少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 EFNA及PFNAⅡ治疗股骨转子间骨折的效果满意,PFNAⅡ更符合国人股骨近端的解剖结构,手术更加方便、快捷,术中操作不当及术后大腿疼痛发生率低。
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期890-892,共3页 Guangdong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1ELIS J, CHECHIK O, MAMAN E, et al. Expandable proximal femoral nails versus 95 dynamic condylar screw - plates for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures[ J]. Injury, 2012, 43(8) : 1313 - 1317.
  • 2MACHERAS G A, KOUTSOSTATHIS S D, GALANAKOS S, et al. Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures? [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012,470 ( 11 ) :3067 - 3076.
  • 3XU Y Z, GENG D C, MAO H Q, et al. A comparison of the proxi- mal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture [ J ]. J Int Med Res, 2010,38(4) :1266 - 1275.
  • 4FOLMAN Y, RON N, SHABAT S, et al. Steinberg Peritrochan- teric fractures treated with the Fixion expandable proximal femoral nail: technical note and report of early results [ J ]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2006,126 ( 3 ) :211 - 214.
  • 5SMITH W R, ZIRAN B, AGUDELO J F, et al. Expandable intra- medullary nailing for tibial and femoral fractures: a preliminary analysis of perioperative complications [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2006,20(5) :310-314.
  • 6MARSHALL L M, ZMUDA J M, CHAN B K, et al. Race and ethnic variation in proximal femur structure and BMD among older men[ J]. J Bone Miner Res, 2008,23 ( 1 ) : 121 - 130.
  • 7陆晴友,李增春,李国风,陈春华,孙贵新,吴韦,李旭,徐贤.PFNA及PFNAⅡ治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效分析[J].国际骨科学杂志,2011,32(1):54-56. 被引量:62
  • 8STEINBERG E L, STERNHEIM A, BLACHAR A. Femoral head density on CT scans of patients following hip fracture fixation by expandable proximal peg or dynamic screw [ J ]. Injury, 2010,41 (6) :647 -651.
  • 9KRISTEK D, LOVRIC I, KRISTEK J, et al. The proximal-femo- ral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures[ J ]. Coil Antropo1,2010 ,34 ( 3 ) :937 - 940.
  • 10陆晴友,彭庄,祝建光,李立钧.股骨近端可膨胀髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折及相关并发症的防治[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(4):248-251. 被引量:6

二级参考文献13

  • 1叶一林,柴卫兵,朱天岳,卢宏章,李军,刘宪义.股骨粗隆间骨折内固定手术后并发症原因分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(12):890-892. 被引量:59
  • 2陆晴友,吴岳嵩,王成焘.股骨近端解剖形态的CT三维重建与分析[J].第二军医大学学报,2005,26(9):1029-1033. 被引量:37
  • 3彭庄,祝建光,蔡俊丰,黄宇峰.可膨胀股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子部骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(8):783-784. 被引量:7
  • 4Lee PC,Yu SW,Hsieh PH,et al. Treatment of early cut-out of a lag screw using a trochanter supporting plate : 11 consecutive patients with unstable intertre chanteric fractures [ J ]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2004,2:119 - 122.
  • 5Lepore S, Capuano N, Lepore L, et al. Clinical and radiographic resuits with the fixion intramedullary nail:an inflatable self-locking system for long bone fractures [ J ]. Osteo Trauma Care, 2002,10 : 32 - 35.
  • 6Smith WR, Ziran B, Agudelo JF, et al. Expandable intramedullary nailing for tibial and femoral fractures : a preliminary analysis of perioperative complications [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma,2006,5:310 - 314.
  • 7Folman Y, Ron N, Shabat S, et al. Peritrochanterie fractures treated with the fixion expandable proximal femoral nail:technical note and report of early results[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2006,3:211 - 214.
  • 8Koval KJ. Intramedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures [ J ]. Am J Orthop,2007 ,4 :4 - 7.
  • 9Steinberg EL, Blumberg N, Dekel S. The fixion proximal femur nailing system: biomechanical properties of the nail and a cadaveric study [ J]. J Biomech,2005,1:63 -68.
  • 10Luciano L, Stefano L, Nicola M. Intramedullary nailing of the femur with an inflatable self-locking nail: comparison with locked nailing [ J ]. J Orthop Sci ,2003,8:796 - 801.

共引文献66

同被引文献54

  • 1Elis J,Chechik O,Maman E,et al.Expandable proximal femoralnails verss 95 dynamic condyiar screw-plates f\r the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures[J]. lnjury,2012,43(8):1313-1317.
  • 2Aros B, Tosteson AN, Gottlieb DJ,et al . Is a sliding hipscrew or imnail the preferred implant for intertmchantericfracture fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2008,466(11):2827-2832.
  • 3Kesmezacar H? Ayhan E,Unlu MC,et al .Predictors of mor-tality in elderly patients with an intertmchanteric or a femoralneck fracture[J]. J Trauma , 2010 ?68(23) : 153-158.
  • 4Pedersen SJ, Borgbjerg FM, Schousboe B,et al . A compre-mortality[J], J Am Geriatr Soc,2008,56(14) :1831-1838.
  • 5Jones HW,Johnston P,Parker M.Are short femoral nails su-perior to the sliding hip screw A meta-analysis of 24 studiesinvolving 3279 fractures[J]. Int Orthop , 2006,30 (42) : 69-78.
  • 6Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephaiocondylicin tramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for ext-racapsular hip fractures in adults[J]. Cochrane Database SystRev, 2010,16(9):193-196.
  • 7Knobe M,Drescher W,Heussen N, et al .Is helical blade nail-ing superior to locked minimally invasive plating in unstablepertrochanteric fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,47(28):2302-2312.
  • 8Radic R, Yates PJ, Lim TS,et al . 130- versus 135-degreesliding hip screws and failure in pertrochanteric hip fractures[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2014,19(25):242-246.
  • 9Wang J?Ma XL,Ma JX? et al. Biomechanical analysis of fourtypes of internal fixation in subtrochanteric fracture models.[J]. Orthop Surg, 2014,6(2):128-136.
  • 10KInal S,Taspinar F,Gulbandilar E,et al .Comparison of thehip screw on an intertrochanteric femoral fracture using thefinite element method[J]. Int J Med Robot,2014 ,14( 29):1202-1205.

引证文献7

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部