期刊文献+

上市公司投资性房地产计量模式的变更——以三木集团为例

The Measurement Mode Change of the Listed Corporations' Investment Real Estate: Take Sanmu Group as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2006年会计准则变更后,投资性房地产后续计量方式有两种模式选择。三木集团决定变更投资性房地产计量模式后,其公开披露的财务报表发生了很大变化。究其原因,主要是为了增加净资产、美化利润和缓解融资问题。这就说明,上市公司在采用公允价值计量时,可能会存在利润大幅波动以及公允价值难以可靠计量的问题。因此,企业在做出计量模式变更时应谨慎。 After the change of accounting standards in 2006, subsequent measurement ot investment property nas two modes to choose from. Ever since Sanmu Group made the decision to change the measurement mode of investment real estate, its financial statements has undergone great changes. The intention is mainly to increase net assets and profits and ease financing problems. This indicates that when the listed companies use fair value measurement, there may be significant fluctuations of the profits as well as difficulty in the reliable measurement of the fair value. Therefore, com- panies should be cautious in making changes of metering mode.
作者 许晓华
机构地区 郑州大学商学院
出处 《宜宾学院学报》 2014年第2期65-68,共4页 Journal of Yibin University
关键词 投资性房地产 公允价值 影响 动因 存在问题 investment property fair value influence motivation problems
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1财政部会计司组织翻译.国际会计准则第40号一投资性房地产[J].会计研究,2000(7):60-65.
  • 2财政部会计司.关于我国上市公司2007年执行新会计准则情况的分析报告[J/OL].中国证券报,(2008-07一01)[2013-10-29].http://www.enstock.corn/paper-new/ht-ml/2008-07/01/content_62439796.htm.
  • 3财政部会计司.我国上市公司2008年执行企业会计准则情况分析报告[J/OL].上海证券报,(2009-07-23)[2013一10-29].http://www.cnstock.com/paper_new/html/2009一07/23/content_71137391.htm.
  • 4财政部会计司.我国上市公司2009年执行企业会计准则情况分析报告--基于企业会计准则实施的经济效果[EB/OL].(2010-05-28)[2013-10-29]http://kjs.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/gongzuodongtai/201005/t20100528--320239.html.
  • 5财政部会计司.我国上市公司2010年执行企业会计准则情况分析报告[EB/OL].(2011-09-28)[2013-10-29]ht-tp://kjs.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/diaochayanjiu/201109/t20110928_597075.html.
  • 6三木集团.2012年度报告[EB/OL].(2013-04-16)[2013-10-29].http://www.cninfo.eom.cn/finalpage/2013-04-16/62366294.PDF.
  • 7三木集团.2011年度报告[EB/OL].(2012-04-20)[2013-10-29].http://www.cninfo.com.cn/finalpage/2012-04-20/60863368.PDF.
  • 8三木集团.2009年度报告[EB/OL].(2010-04-02)[2013-10-29].http://data.eastmoney.com/notice/20100402/eNQlx.html.
  • 9三木集团.2010年度报告[EB/OL].(2011-04-12)[2013-10-29].http://www.cninfo.tom.cn/finalpage/2011-04-12/59251691.PDF.
  • 10张文,符刚.投资性房地产公允价值计量模式的运用及完善策略——基于ST国商案例分析[J].财会研究,2013(1):48-51. 被引量:10

二级参考文献24

  • 1CFA Institute Centre (2008). Fair Value Reporting [ DB/OL]. http://www. cfainstitute. org/centre/ topics/reporting/official/fair_value_reporting.html.
  • 2Ball, R. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) : Pros and Cons for Investors [ J]. Accounting and Business Research, 2006, ( 36 ) ( Special Issue ) : 5 - 27.
  • 3Watts, R. L. What Has the Invisible Hand Achieved ? [J]. Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum,2006,51 -61.
  • 4Watts, R. L. , Zimmerman, J. L. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards [ J ]. Accounting Review, 1978,53 ( 1 ) : 112 - 133.
  • 5European Central Bank. Fair Value Accounting and Financial Stability, Occasional paper series [ DB/OL]. 2004, (13) ,www. ecb. int.
  • 6Bartov, E. , Bodnar, G. M. Alternative Accounting Methods, Information Asymmetry and Liquidity: Theory and Evidence [J]. The Accounting Review, 1996, (71) :397 -418.
  • 7Muller, K, Riedl, E. , Scllhorn, T. Consequences of Voluntary and Mandatory Fair Value Accounting: Evidence Surrounding IFRS Adoption in the EU Real Estate Industry[R]. Working Paper, 2009-033 Harvard Business School.
  • 8Christensen, H. B. , Nikolaev, V. Who Uses Fair - Value Accounting for Non -Financial Assets Following IFRS Adoption [ DB/OL]. 2008 -08 ,www. ssrn. com.
  • 9财政部会计准则委员会.国际财务报告准则2008[M].北京:中国财政出版社,2008.
  • 10Francesco Avallone. Fair Value or Cost Model? Drivers of Choice for IAS 40 in the Real Estate Industry[EB/OL]. http: //ssm.com/abstract= 1262205, 2008-04-15.

共引文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部