摘要
目的评价江西省11地市村卫生室的服务能力。方法 2010年10月对江西省11个地市的26 287所村卫生室采用普查法收集资料,查阅文献、小组讨论及专家咨询确立评价指标体系,采用密切值(Ci)法进行服务能力评价。结果指标体系包括5个一级指标和15个二级指标。村卫生室服务能力Ci值从小到大依次为鹰潭市(0.000 0)、吉安市(0.223 5)、赣州市(0.545 2)、萍乡市(0.554 6)、新余市(0.577 2)、宜春市(0.889 0)、上饶市(0.926 6)、景德镇市(1.073 4)、九江市(1.395 1)、抚州市(1.477 9)和南昌市(1.760 1)。结论江西省11地市中鹰潭市、吉安市和赣州市村卫生室服务能力相对较好,南昌市、抚州市和九江市村卫生室服务能力相对较差。
Objective To evaluate the service capacity of village clinics of 11 cities in Jiangxi. Methods The data was collected by census. The service capacity was evaluated by the close - value method, and the evaluation indicator system was established through literature review, group discussion and expert consultation. Results The evaluation indicator system included 5 first - level indicators and 15 second - level indicators. The C~ value of the service capacity of village clinics of 11 cities from small to large was Yingtan (0.000 0), Ji'an (0.223 5), Ganzhou (0.545 2), Pingxiang (0.554 6), Xinyu (0.577 2), Yichun (0. 889 0), Shangrao (0. 926 6), Jingdezhen ( 1. 073 4), Jiujiang ( 1. 395 1 ), Fuzhou ( 1. 477 9) and Nanehang ( 1. 760 1 ) . Conclusion The service capacity of village clinics of Yingtan, Ji'an and Ganzhou was better, while the service ca- pacity of village clinics of Nanchang, Fuzhou and Jiujiang was poorer.
出处
《中国全科医学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第4期389-390,395,共3页
Chinese General Practice
关键词
评价
服务能力
村卫生室
密切值法
Evaluation
Service capacity
Village clinics
Close - value method