期刊文献+

扰动载荷对冲击矿压危险性的影响研究 被引量:4

The influence of stress disturbance on the danger of rock burst
原文传递
导出
摘要 能量积聚程度及积聚位置是判别冲击矿压是否发生的2个重要参数,据此提出了评价冲击矿压危险性的能量密度准则。运用LS-DYNA模拟了扰动载荷作用下巷道围岩的能量积聚过程及应力波强度对冲击矿压危险程度的影响,得到了一定围岩应力状态下巷帮围岩能量积聚的大小、位置及能量密度因子等结果。模拟研究表明:1)随扰动强度pmax的增加,能量积聚区总体向外扩张,范围增大,且能量积聚区逐步向巷道边缘位置移近;当pmax由5 MPa至20 MPa变化时,巷道围岩能量积聚区最大能量密度Udmax由2.007 MJ/m3增至3.981 MJ/m3,增幅达到198%。2)受扰动影响,能量积聚区逐步向巷道边缘位置移动,能量密度因子值增大,k值由1.384 MJ/m4增至4.976 MJ/m4,增幅达到259%,发生冲击矿压的危险性显著提高。 The energy accumulation and its position are two main factors on judging the rock burst occurring. An energy density criterion to distinguish the danger of rock burst is put forward based on this assumption in this paper. The process of the energy accumulation and the effect of the intensity of stress wave Pmax to the energy accumulation are simulated and analyzed by employing ANSYS/LS-DYNA, and the characteristic and the position of the energy accumulation are obtained. Research results show that: 1) With the stress wave increasing the value of the Udmax is increasing. When the intensity of stress wave pmax increasing from 5 MPa to 20 MPa, the incremental value of the energy density is 2.007 MJ/m^3 to 3.981 MJ/m^3, incremental rate reaching 98%; 2) Due to the impact of the distribution intensity Pmax, with the stress wave increasing the position of Udmax moves to the inside of the roadway side. When the intensity of stress wave pmax increasing from 5 MPa to 20 MPa, the incremental value of energy density factor k is 1.384 MJ/m^4 to 4.976 MJ/m^4, incremental rate reaching 259%, which means the notable increase of the possibility of the rock burst.
出处 《采矿与安全工程学报》 EI 北大核心 2014年第2期175-179,共5页 Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2013CB227900) 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室开放基金项目(10KF08) 中国博士后基金项目(20110491483) 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室自主课题项目(SKLCRSM11X02)
关键词 应力波 冲击矿压 能量密度 stress wave rock burst energy density
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1MORRISON R G K. Theory and the practical problem of rock bursts[J]. Engineering and Mining Journal, 1948, 149(3): 66-72.
  • 2BRADY B T. Anomalous seismicity prior to rock bursts; implications for earthquake prediction[J]. Pure and Ap- plied Geophysics, 1977, 115(1/2): 357-374.
  • 3MUELLER W. Numerical simulation of rock bursts[J]. Mining Science & Technology, 1991, 12(1): 27-42.
  • 4CASTEN U, FAJKLEWlCZ Z. Induced gravity anoma- lies and rock-burst risk in coal mines: a case history[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1993, 41(1): 1-13.
  • 5赵本均 滕学军.冲击矿压及其防治[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1995..
  • 6王贤能,黄润秋.动力扰动对岩爆的影响分析[J].山地研究,1998,16(3):188-192. 被引量:20
  • 7MANSUROV V A. Prediction of rock bursts by analysis of induced seismicity data[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2001, 38(6): 893-901.
  • 8戚承志,钱七虎.岩石等脆性材料动力强度依赖应变率的物理机制[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(2):177-181. 被引量:142
  • 9DYSKIN A V, GERMANOVICH L N. Model of rock burst caused by cracks growing near free surface[C]// Younged. Rockburst and seismic@ in mines, rotterdam: AABalkema, 1993: 169-174.
  • 10GERMANOVICH L N, DYSKM A V, TSYRULNIKOV N M, et al. A model of the deformation and fracture of brittle materials with cracks under uniaxial compres- sion[J]. Mechanics of Solids, 1993, 28(1): 116-128.

二级参考文献4

  • 1黄润秋,王贤能,唐胜传.深埋隧道地震动力响应的复反应分析[J].工程地质学报,1997,5(1):1-7. 被引量:27
  • 2哈努卡耶夫 刘殿中译.矿岩爆破物理过程[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1989..
  • 3张倬元,工程地质分析原理,1992年,86页
  • 4赵辛源,岩石力学在工程中的应用,1989年,373页

共引文献158

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部