传统人流与无痛人流终止早孕的临床对比研究

Clinical Comparative Study of Traditional Abortion and Painless Abortion for Terminating Early Pregnancy

目的评价传统人流与无痛人流对于早孕终止的临床效果,为人工流产的选择提供理论依据。方法选取2010年6月至2012年8月间来我院就诊并行人工流产的患者246例,按照患者自主意愿实施手术,分为无痛人流组150例和传统人流组96例,对比评价两组的临床效果。结果①与传统人流相比,无痛人流组患者的手术时间显著缩短(P<0.05),但两组术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②无痛人流组9例出现疼痛,显著低于传统人流组(P<0.05)。③两组均无流产失败的病例出现。④无痛人流组术后并发症的发生率为2.67%,显著低于传统人流组(P<0.05)。结论无痛人流显著缩短了手术时间,改善了患者的疼痛感,对于术后并发症的发生也起到良好的抑制作用,对于终止早孕是一种安全有效的方法,值得在临床广泛应用。

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of traditional abortion and painless abortion for terminating early pregnancy, so as to provide theoretical basis for the choice of abortion. Methods 246 patients with artificial abortion in our hospital from June 2010 to August 2012 were selected in this study and divided into painless abortion group （150 cases） and traditional abortion group （96 cases）. The clinical effects of two groups were observed and compared. Results （~）Compared with traditional abortion group, painless abortion group had significant shorter operating time （P 〈0.05）, but there was no significant difference in intraoperatve blood loss （P〉0.05）. （~）9 cases of painless abortion group had pain, significant less than traditional abortion group （P 〈0.05）. （~）No case of abortion failure occurred in both groups. （~The incidence of postoperative complication was 2.67% in painless abortion group, significantly lower than of traditional abortion group （P〈0.05）. Conclusions Painless abortion can significantly shorten operating time, reduce patients＇ pain, and reduce the postoperative complication. It is a safe and effective method for terminating early pregnancy, and worthy of clinical promotion.