期刊文献+

3种抛光方法对树脂表面粗糙度影响的比较 被引量:6

Effects of three polishing methods on surface roughness of composite resin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过定性与定量分析比较3种抛光方法对3种不同树脂表面粗糙度的影响。方法将3种不同类型的树脂制作成15个直径为5 mm,厚度为3 mm的圆柱体样本,随机分为3组:Sof-Lex抛光碟组,Brilliant Gloss橡皮抛光尖组,One Gloss橡皮抛光尖组。抛光后用轮廓测定仪在样本测试面中心区测表面粗糙度(Ra),然后每个小组中随机选取1个样本,采用原子力显微镜观察其表面微观形貌。结果 Sof-Lex、One Gloss抛光后,3种不同树脂的Ra均值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单因素方差分析结果显示材料组之间、抛光方法组之间Ra均值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且组内两两比较结果显示同种树脂3种抛光方法之间Ra均值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素方差分析结果显示材料类型和抛光方法均会影响树脂表面粗糙度,二者具有明显交互作用(P<0.01)。原子力显微镜观察结果显示Sof-Lex和Brilliant Gloss抛光后树脂表面相对均一,One Gloss抛光后树脂表面有划痕、空穴、填料颗粒突出等结构。结论 3种树脂之间、3种不同抛光方法之间Ra均值差异均存在统计学意义,抛光效果具有材料依赖性。 Objective To compare the difference in effects of three polishing procedures on the surface roughness of three different composite resins by quantitative and qualitative analysis. Methods Cylindrical specimens with 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness were iabricated by filling three composite resins into plastic tubilbrm moulds. Before pof ishing, tested surfaces of all resin blocks were finished to get uniform surfaces by high-speed 10 μm diamond burs. Then fifteen specimens for each composite resin were randomly divided into three polishing groups: Sof-Lex discs, Brilliant Gloss rubber points, One Gloss rubber points. The average surface roughness ( Ra. μm) of the polished surfaces was evaluated by profilometer. The surface morphology of one representative specimen of each group was observed under atom-ic force microscope (AFM). Results Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the significant interaction between materials and polishing procedures. Significant differences were detected among both the resins and the polishing techniques. There were no statistic differences between packable composite Solitair2 and hybrid composite Charisma. There were no statistic differences among three composite resins polished by Brilliant Gloss. The AFM showed that the Brilliant Gloss created a relatively uniform surface. One Gloss scratched and plucked the particles away from the surface. Conclusion The smoothest surfaces were observed after treatment with Brilliant Gloss for packable composite Solitair2 and hybrid composite Charisma. The nanofilled composite Venus attained the smoothest surfaces polished by Sof-Lex discs. For all resins, the use of One Gloss points resulted in the roughest surfaces. Regardless of the polishing techniques, the nanofilled composite Venus attained the smoothest surfaces.
出处 《广东牙病防治》 2014年第3期134-138,共5页 Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
关键词 抛光 复合树脂 表面粗糙度 轮廓测定仪 原子力显微镜 Polishing Resin composite Surface roughness Profilometer Atomic force microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Attar N. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the sur- face roughness of composite resin materials [ J ]. J Contemp Dent Praet, 2007,8( 1 ) :27-35.
  • 2Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T. Influence of polishing du- ration on surface roughness of resin composites [ J ]. J Oral Sci, 2005,47( 1 ) :21-25.
  • 3Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, Navarro MF. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of mierofilled, hy- brid and packable composite resins[ J ]. Braz Dent J, 2005,16 ( 1 ) : 39-44.
  • 4Jt/ng M, Homung K, Klimek J. Polishing occlusal surfaces of direct Class II composite restorations in vivo [ J ]. Oper Dent, 2005,30 ( 2 ) : 139-146.
  • 5Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites[J]. Oper Dent, 2002,27(3) :243-247.
  • 6Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ, Coury TL. Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative mate- rials[J]. Quintessence Int, 1996,27(4) :279-285.
  • 7Turssi CP, Ferraeane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin compos- ites as related to finishing and polishing procedures[ J]. Dent Mater, 2005,21 (7) :641-648.
  • 8Joniot S, Salnmon JP, Dejou J. Use of two surface analyzers to evalu- ate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing[ J]. Oper Dent, 2006,31 (1) :39-46.
  • 9Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, et al. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins [ J ]. Dent Mater, 1985,1 (6) :225-227.
  • 10Joniot SB, Gregoire GL, Auther AM. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing se- quences for three composite resins[ J ]. Oper Dent, 2000,25 (4) : 311-315.

同被引文献42

  • 1张雪洋,胡飞,刘小明.含钛合金全冠适合性研究[J].广东牙病防治,2005,13(3):202-203. 被引量:4
  • 2Elsaka SE, Swain MV. Effect of surface treatments on adhesion of low-fusing porcelain to titanium as determined by strain energy re- lease rate[J]. Dent Mater, 2011,27(10) :1213-1220.
  • 3Yan M, Takahashi H. Titanium casting using commercial phosphate- bonded investments with quick heating method [ J ] Dent Mater J, 2006,25 (2) : 391-398.
  • 4Tolga K, Murat K. Effect of different air-abrasion particles on metal- ceramic bond strength[J]. J Dent Sci, 2011,6(3) :140-146.
  • 5Monica BL, Valeria OP. Effect of investment type and mold tempera- ture on casting accuracy and titanium-ceramic bond[ J]. Brazil Dent J, 2013,24(1) :103-107.
  • 6Campos F, Almeida CS. Effect of different surface treatments on resin-bonding to hybrid material [ J ]. Dent Mater, 2014,30 ( 8 ) : 137-142.
  • 7Filiz A, Isa Y. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion [ J ]. J Pros- thetic Dent, 2010,103 (4) : 221-227.
  • 8E1-Safty S, Akhtar R, Silikas N, et al. Nanomechanical properties of dental resin-composites[ J ]. Dent Mater, 2012,28 ( 12 ) : 1292- 1300.
  • 9Gil FJ, Sdnchez LA, Espas A, et al. In vitro corrosion behaviour and metallic ion release of different prosthodontic alloys [ J ]. Int Dent J, 1999,49(6) :361-367.
  • 10Guilin Y, Nan L. The effects of different types of investments on the alpha-case layer of titanium castings[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007,97 (1) :15"/-164.

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部