期刊文献+

传感器选择问题的GSS算法有效性分析与改进

Effectivity Analysis and Improvement of GSS Algorithm for Sensor Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 讨论了GSS算法的最优性,通过理论分析和反例证明了该算法不能保证解的最优性,并在系统状态维度大于观测向量维度的情况下,针对GSS算法起点随意性导致解变差的问题,提出了一种结合穷举搜索的改进方法.实验结果表明,GSS改进算法在实际中具有较好的效果,算法的最优率在90%以上,在未获得最优解的情况下,其所获解与最优解之间的误差在0.35%以下。文中最后以无线传感器网络中的目标跟踪问题为实例进行了仿真实验,结果表明GSS改进算法比原算法更优. In this paper,first,the optimality of GSS algorithm is discussed,and a theoretical analysis as well as several counter-examples is presented to prove that the traditional GSS algorithm does not guarantee the obtaining of optimal solution.Then,in the condition that the state vector dimension is larger than the observation vector dimen-sion,an improved GSS algorithm combining the exhaustive search is proposed to avoid the selection result degrada-tion due to the randomness of initial solution selection.Experimental results indicate that the improved algorithm is effective in practice because it is of a high optimal selection rate of more than 90%and a low solution error of less than 0.35%even when the optimal selections are suboptimum.Moreover,the simulated results of the target track-ing in wireless sensor networks demonstrate that the improved GSS algorithm is superior to the traditional one.
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期43-49,共7页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家"863"计划项目(2011AA010106)
关键词 传感器选择 最优观测 目标跟踪 有效性 sensor selection optimal observation target tracking effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献32

  • 1I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, Wireless sensor networks: A survey, Computer Networks, 2002, 38:393-422.
  • 2J. E. Besag, Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems, J. Royal Statiscal Soc., Ser. B, 1974, 32(2): 192-236.
  • 3F. Bian, D. Kempe, and R. Govindan, Utility based sensor selection, Proceeding of IPSN~)6, Nashville, Tennessee, 2006.
  • 4S. Joshi and S. Boyd, Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Signal P~ocessing, 2009, 57(2): 451-462.
  • 5D. Bajovic, B. Sinopoli, and J. Xavier, Sensor selection for hypothesis testing in wireless sensor networks: A Kullback-Leibler based approach, Proceeding of CDCU9, Shanghai, 2009.
  • 6A. Krause, A. Singh, and C. Guestrin, Near-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes: Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical Studies, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2008, 9:235 284.
  • 7Z. Q. Luo, Universal decentralized estimation in a bandwidth constrained sensor network, IEEE Transactions on Information Theor'y, 2005, 51(6): 2210-2219.
  • 8K. You, L. Xie, S. Sun, and W. Xiao, Multiple-level quantized innovation Kalman filter, Proc. 17th IFAC World Congress, Korea, 2007.
  • 9D. Williamson, Digital Control and Implementation, Prentice-Hall, 1991.
  • 10P. D. Sampson and P. Guttorp, Nonparametric estimation of non-stationary spatial covariance structure, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1992, 87(417): 108 119.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部