期刊文献+

仲裁司法审查实践中的共识?——2012年申请撤销北京仲裁委员会裁决之民事裁定的实证分析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 人民法院在对撤销仲裁裁决申请进行审查的过程中,除了严格遵循相关规定外,还应了解仲裁的具体实践,尊重仲裁的特性和规律,北京市第二中级人民法院堪称这方面的表率。通过对2012年北京市第二中级人民法院审理撤销北京仲裁委员会仲裁裁决案件的分析可以发现,人民法院与仲裁机构之间能够在很多方面达成共识。这些共识反过来对仲裁案件的审理提供指引,亦可供其他人民法院在审查当事人的撤销仲裁裁决申请时参考和借鉴。 During the process of reviewing applications on revocation of awards, people's courts should comply with law provisions, master the practice and recognize the characteristics of arbitration. In this respect, Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court sets a good example. By analyzing orders about applications on revocation of awardsin the year of 2012, we could find that there are many consensus between people's courts and arbitration commissions. consensus could provide guidance other people's courts' reference.
作者 章杰超
机构地区 北京仲裁委员会
出处 《北京仲裁》 2013年第3期63-78,共16页 Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词 撤销 仲裁裁决 共识 司法审查 revocation judicial review to arbitral cases, and also And these could be for arbitral award consensus
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献44

  • 1肖永平.内国、涉外仲裁监督机制之我见——对《中国涉外仲裁监督机制评析》一文的商榷[J].中国社会科学,1998(2):94-97. 被引量:29
  • 2肖永平.也谈我国法院对仲裁的监督范围——与陈安先生商榷[J].法学评论,1998,16(1):42-49. 被引量:57
  • 3陈安.中国涉外仲裁监督机制评析[J].中国社会科学,1995(4):19-30. 被引量:64
  • 4P. Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 34.
  • 5Articles 34 and 36 of the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law.
  • 6P Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice- A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 33.
  • 7P. Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? - Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice - A Comparative Study, Kluwer Law International, 1999, p. 28.
  • 8L. Goldman, Contractually Expanded Review of Arbitration Awards, 8 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 171 (Spring 2003).
  • 9W H Knull, III and N. D. Rubins, Betting the Farm on International Arbitration: Is it Time to Offer an Appeal Option? 11 The American Review of International Arbitration 531 (2000).
  • 10T J Klitgaard, The Transnational Arbitration of High-Tech Disputes, presentation given to the 7th Annual Transnational Commercial Arbitration of Workshop, Dallas, Texas, June 20 1996. Available at http://www, wirepaladln, com/articles/article9, htm.

共引文献47

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部