期刊文献+

论《京都议定书》第二期承诺对国家发展权的保障及其局限性 被引量:3

Safeguards for the right of national development in the second phase of Kyoto Protocol and its limitations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《京都议定书》签字以来,减排承诺国家的数量以及内容都发生了一些变化。《京都议定书》第二期承诺在"共同但有区别的责任"原则、气候损害补偿机制以及国际合作等方面具有正当性,对国家发展权进行了一定程度的保障,但其局限性在于发达国家的减排承诺国减少,减排力度有限,发达国家提供资金和技术支持的政治意愿不足。在今后的气候变化问题谈判上,应通过坚持"共同但有区别的责任"原则,建构替代性国际气候法律约束机制,完善"气候决策"的程序保障机制,提高"气候条约"的强制执行性等方式来保障国家发展权。我国应通过合理构建碳排放交易法律制度,加强节能减排技术的法律促进,完善碳排放的司法控制等具体措施来提升应对气候变化的硬实力。 After the signature of Kyoto Protocol,the number and members of countries committed to the reduction of carbon emission has undergone some changes.The second phase of Kyoto Protocol provides safeguards for the right of national development by upholding the validity of the principle of'common but differentiated responsibilities',compensation mechanism of climate damage and international cooperation.However,it has limitations,i.e.the number of developed countries committed to the emission reduction decreased,the enforcement of emission reduction was not effective,and development countries lacked the political will to provide funds and technology.In the future negotiations of climate changes,more actions can be taken in accordance with the principle of'common but differentiated responsibilities' to ensure the right of national development.China needs to expand its capacity in dealing with climate changes by formulating related laws,developing technology for energy saving and emission reduction,and strengthening judicial control of carbon emission.
机构地区 重庆大学法学院
出处 《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期42-48,135,共7页 Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 国家社科基金课题"我国农业贸易生态化转型的法律保障研究"(12BFX143)成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献107

共引文献215

同被引文献68

  • 1孙玉树,杨敏,师长立,贾东强,裴玮,孙丽敬.储能的应用现状和发展趋势分析[J].高电压技术,2020,46(1):80-89. 被引量:127
  • 2徐泉.试论世界贸易组织的基本原则[J].甘肃社会科学,2005(1):93-96. 被引量:4
  • 3World Bank. International Trade and ClimateChange : Economic,Legal and Institutional Per-spectives[y[~\. Washington DC: World Bank Publi-cations, 2007.
  • 4Lin, B. Q. , Sun, C. W. Evaluating carbon dioxideemissions in international trade of China[J]. Ener-gy Policy , 2010(38) : 613 - 621.
  • 5梁洪杰.论全球经济低碳化背景下我国对外贸易发展的战略抉择[C]//孙琬钟.WTO法与中国论丛:2011年卷.北京:知识产权出版社,2011:263-277.
  • 6Lenzen,M.,Marray, J. , Sack,F. , etc. Sharedproducer and consumer responsibility-theory andpractice[J]. Ecological Economics,2007, 61(1):27-42.
  • 7WTO. The Multilateral Trading System and Cli-mate Change: Introduction[EB/OL]. [2014 - 04 -16]. http: // www. wto. org/english/tratop_e/envir一e/climate_intro_e. htm.
  • 8Behringer, C.,Balistreri, E. J. , Rutherford, T.F. The role of border carbon adjustment in unila-teral climate policy j overview of an energy mode-ling forum study (EMF 29) [J]. Energy Econom-ics , 2012(34):97-110.
  • 9World Bank (2010)"Trade in 'Virtual Carbon' - Empirical Results and Implications for Policy", Washington DC: World Bank,.
  • 10边永民.贸易措施在减排温室气体制度安排中的作用[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2009,46(1):41-47. 被引量:8

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部