期刊文献+

美国渔业公共信托理论评析——中国构建现代渔业管理制度的借鉴 被引量:1

Comments on the Public Trust Doctrine of US Fishery——Inlightment of the Construction of Modern Fishery Management System for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在美国法上,渔业资源被界定为具有特殊性质的物,不适合由私人所有或者在特定情况下即使由州和联邦政府授权私人享有使用权,其权利人也不得排除公众对渔业资源享有天然的利益。"公产"与"私产"之争、公共渔业权与个人排他性捕捞权之争催生了英美法上特有的利益平衡机制——"有限介入权制度":将渔业资源归入公共信托资源,以此破解哈丁所关切的"公地悲剧"。我国《渔业法》虽经两次修订,但仍然不足以调整日益繁复的渔业法律关系。借鉴公共信托原则作为现代渔业管理创新机制的理论基础,并使之转化为我国渔业法条款,可望构建起有中国特色的现代渔业管理制度体系。 According to the American law, fishery resources have been defined as a thing with special characte-ristics, which is not allowed for private ownership or even under particular circumstances with state or federal authorization not allowed to use exclusively, and whose holders may not interfere the public with the use of natural interests such as fishery resources. Those disputes, which are between "public" and "private property" and between public access to fishery and individual exclusive fishing rights expedite a special interests balancing mechanism, limited access right, which is typical in Anglo-American law system. It would make fishery resources Public Trust resources in order to give solution to the Tragedy of Commons. Even after two amendments, Fisheries Law of the Peoples Republic still cannot meet the need to adjust the increasingly complicated fishery legal relationship. The paper holds that the Public Trust Doctrine is the theoretical basis of the modern fisheries management innovation mechanism. One should learn from the Doctrine, convert it into Terms of Fisheries Law in China, and construct a modern fisheries management system with Chinese characteristics.
作者 张艾妮
机构地区 广东海洋大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 2013年第8期63-73,共11页 Pacific Journal
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年项目"海洋渔业资源养护与管理的法律问题研究"(09YJC820018)的成果之一
关键词 渔业资源 公共信托理论 有限介入权 渔业管理 fishery resources Public Trust Doctrine limited access fishery management
  • 相关文献

参考文献70

  • 1我国《渔业法》第二十二条.
  • 2Ransom A. Myers & Boris Worm, Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities, Nature,2003 (428), pp. 280,282.
  • 3Boris Worm et al. , "Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services", SCI, 2006(314) ,pp. 787,790.
  • 4John Tiemey, Op - Ed. , "Where the Tuna Roam", Times, Nov. 4, 2006, at A19.
  • 5Soliman, Adam, " Individual Transferable Quotas in World Fisheries . A Legal Analysis and the Property Right Dimension" ( Octo- ber 1, 2012). Available at SSRN. http.//ssm, corn/abstract = 2155244 or http.//dx, doi. org/10. 2139/ssm. 2155244.
  • 6周立波.渔业财产权与海洋渔业资源养护制度的构建[J].中国渔业经济,2011,29(1):91-96. 被引量:8
  • 7Garrett Hardin, "The Tragedy of the Commons", SCI, 1968 (168) .p. 1243.
  • 8Rod Fujita et al. , " Rationality or Chaos? Global Fisheries at the Crossroads", in Defying Ocean' s End . An Agenda for Action, Linda K. Glover & Sylvia A. Earle eds. , 2004.
  • 9Jonathan H. Adler, "Conservation Through Collusion . Antitrust as an Obstacle to Marine Resource Conservation", WASH. & LEE L. REV. , 2004(61 ) ,p. 42.
  • 10Seth Maeinko, "Public or Private?. United States Commercial Fisheries Management and the Public Trust Doe- trine, Reciprocal Challenges", N. R J. , 1993 (33) ,p. 919.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Garrett Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons[M].Sci.,1968:1243.
  • 2Harold Demsetz,Toward a Theory of Property Rights[J].Am. Econ. Rev.,1967, (7):347-355.
  • 3James E. Wilen, Property Rights and the Texture of Rents in Fisheries [J].Ecology L.Q., 2002, (6):54.
  • 4F.A.Hayek, The Use of Knowledge in Society[J].Am. Econ. Rev.,1945 (6):135.
  • 5James Linderson, Aquaculture and the Future: Why Fisheries Economists Should Care[J].Marine Resource Econ.,2002, (1):133-134.
  • 6Josh Eagle, A Window into the Regulated Commons: The Takings Clause, Investment Security, and Sustainability[J].Ecology Law Quarterly, 2007, (6): 619-654.
  • 7Hope M. Babcock, Grotius, Ocean Fish Ranching, and the Public Trust Doctrine: Ride 'Em Charlie Tuna[J].Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2007, (6):3-76.
  • 8Bruce Yandle & Andrew P. Morriss, The Technologies of Property Rights: Choice Among Alternative Solutions to Tragedies of the Commons[J].28 Ecology L.Q., 2008 ,(5): 123,139-41.
  • 9Daniel H. Cole, Clearing the Air: Four Propositions About Property Rights and Environmental Protection[J].10 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F.,2009,(2):103,117-25.
  • 10Steven N. S. Cheung, The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-ExclUsive Resource[J].13 J.L. & Econ., 2000,(6):49-51.

共引文献13

同被引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部