期刊文献+

Failure time variation derived from R–S relation: the role of the static stress perturbation

Failure time variation derived from R–S relation: the role of the static stress perturbation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In general, earthquake cycle related to earthquake faulting could include four major processes which could be described by (1) fault locking, (2) self-acceleration or nucleation (possible foreshocks), (3) coseismic slip, and (4) post-stress relaxation and afterslip. A sudden static stress change/perturbation in the surrounding crust can advance/ delay the fault instability or failure time and modify earth- quake rates. Based on a simple one-dimensional spring-sli- der block model with the combination of rate-and-state- dependent friction relation, in this study, we have approxi- mately derived the simple analytical solutions of clock advance/delay of fault failures caused by a sudden static Coulomb stress change applied in the different temporal evolution periods during an earthquake faulting. The results have been used in the physics-based explanation of delayed characteristic earthquake in Parkfield region, California, in which the next characteristic earthquake of M 6.0 after 1966 occurred in 2004 instead of around 1988 according to its characteristic return period of 22 years. At the same time, the analytical solutions also indicate that the time advance/ delay in Coulomb stress change derived by the dislocation model has a certain limitation and fundamental flaw. Fur- thermore, we discussed the essential difference between rate- and state-variable constitutive (R-S) model and Coulomb stress model used commonly in current earthquake triggering study, and demonstrated that, in fact, the Coulomb stress model could be involved in the R-S model. The results, we have obtained in this study, could be used in the development of time-dependent fault interaction model and the probability calculation related to the time-dependent and renewal earthquake prediction model. In general, earthquake cycle related to earthquake faulting could include four major processes which could be described by (1) fault locking, (2) self-acceleration or nucleation (possible foreshocks), (3) coseismic slip, and (4) post-stress relaxation and afterslip. A sudden static stress change/perturbation in the surrounding crust can advance/ delay the fault instability or failure time and modify earth- quake rates. Based on a simple one-dimensional spring-sli- der block model with the combination of rate-and-state- dependent friction relation, in this study, we have approxi- mately derived the simple analytical solutions of clock advance/delay of fault failures caused by a sudden static Coulomb stress change applied in the different temporal evolution periods during an earthquake faulting. The results have been used in the physics-based explanation of delayed characteristic earthquake in Parkfield region, California, in which the next characteristic earthquake of M 6.0 after 1966 occurred in 2004 instead of around 1988 according to its characteristic return period of 22 years. At the same time, the analytical solutions also indicate that the time advance/ delay in Coulomb stress change derived by the dislocation model has a certain limitation and fundamental flaw. Fur- thermore, we discussed the essential difference between rate- and state-variable constitutive (R-S) model and Coulomb stress model used commonly in current earthquake triggering study, and demonstrated that, in fact, the Coulomb stress model could be involved in the R-S model. The results, we have obtained in this study, could be used in the development of time-dependent fault interaction model and the probability calculation related to the time-dependent and renewal earthquake prediction model.
出处 《Earthquake Science》 2014年第1期37-46,共10页 地震学报(英文版)
关键词 Keywords Earthquake triggering Fault frictionCoulomb stress change (ACFF) Clock advance/delay Rate-and-state-dependent friction Keywords Earthquake triggering Fault frictionCoulomb stress change (ACFF) Clock advance/delay Rate-and-state-dependent friction
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Bakun W, McEvilly T (1979) Earthquakes near Parkfleld, California: comparing the 1934 and 1966 sequences. Science 205: 1375-1377.
  • 2Bakun WH, Lindh AG (1985) The Parkfield California, earthquake prediction experiment. Science 229(4714):619-624.
  • 3Bakun W, Aagaar(] B, Dost B, Ellsworth W, Hardebeck J, Harris R, Ji C, Johnston M, Langbein J, Lienkaemper J (2005) Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nature 437(7061):969-974.
  • 4"1 \ J Barbot S. Lapusta N. Avouac J-P (2012) Under the hood of the earthquake machine: toward predictive modeling of the seismic cycle. Science 336:707-710.
  • 5Beeler N (2004) Review of the physical basis of laboratory-derived relations for brittle failure and their implications for earthquake occurrence and earthquake nucleation. Pure Appl Geophys 161(9):1853-1876.
  • 6Beeler N, Tullis T, Weeks J (1994) The roles of time and displacement in the evolution effect in rock friction. Geophy Res Lett 21:1987-1990.
  • 7Belardinelli ME, Cocco M, Coutant O, Cotton F (1999) Redistribu- tion of dynamic stress during coseismic ruptures: evidence for fault interaction and earthquake triggering. J Geophys Res 104(B7): 14914-14925.
  • 8Ben-Zion Y, Rice JR, Dmowska R (1993) Interaction of the San Andreas fault creeping segment with adjacent great rupture zones and earthquake recurrence at Parkfield. J Geophy Res: Solid Earth (1978-2012) 98:2135-2144.
  • 9Byerlee J (1978) Friction of rocks. Pure Appl Geophys 116(4): 615-626.
  • 10Dieterich JH (1979) Modeling of rock friction 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J Geophy Res 84(B5):2161-2168.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部