期刊文献+

沉降放射性粒子的活度-粒径累计份额计算

Calculation of cumulative activity-size distribution of fallout particles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据美国Small Boy试验的近场远爆心区域(Off-site)剂量场分布图,计算了不同区域内沉降至地面的放射性活度累积份额,结合动力学沉降预报程序给出的不同粒径粒子落地范围,计算得到了不同放射性活度累积份额下的粒子粒径下限。结果表明,试验产生的百微米以上粒径的粒子携带的放射性活度份额约为Bridgeman方程估算结果的86%。本方法可以扩展至不同爆高的地面爆炸场景,分析其近区沉降物的放射性份额,对于优化放射性沉降预报程序具有一定价值;对于发展分凝模型、分析放射性物质在各种粒子中的分布规律等具有重要意义。 Background: Activity-size distribution of fallout particles plays an important role in fallout prediction project. It also suggests how radioactive nuclides attached by carriers such as soil particles or debris and helps us know why fractionation happens. It should be determined by sampling, measurement and analysis, but not all this work well done in each ground explosion. Purpose: Feasibility of work to calculate the lower limit of particle size with special cumulate activity fraction by off-site contours of residual gamma radiation and dynamic model that can trace fallout particles was examined. Methods: Off-site contours of residual gamma radiation from Small Boy test were digitized, and the cumulative activity fraction in each area was estimated. Based on the spatial distribution of particles of different sizes deposited on the ground surface, which is calculated with a dynamic fallout prediction code, the lower limit of particle size with special cumulate activity fraction was discovered. Results: The results show that cumulative activity contribution from particles with diameter of a few hundred micrometer was 14% less than obtained with Bridgeman Equation. Conclusion: It's feasible to calculate cumulative activity-size distribution of fallout particles from off-site contours of residual gamma radiation, and this work can help us to know activity-size distribution in different ground nuclear explosions.
出处 《核技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期35-40,共6页 Nuclear Techniques
关键词 放射性沉降 剂量场 累积放射性活度一粒径分布 Fallout, Radiation field, Cumulative activity-size distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Norment H (3. DELFIC: Department of defense fallout prediction system. Volume I - fundamentals[R]. Washington D. C.: Defense Nuclear Agency, 1979.
  • 2O'Day B E. Estimation of weapon yield from inversion ofdose-rate contours[D]. Wright Patterson AFB: Air Force Institute of Technology, 2009.
  • 3Moroz B E, Beck H L, Bouville A, et al. Predictions of dispersion and deposition of fallout from nuclear testing using the NOAA-HYSPLIT meteorological model[J]. Health Physics, 2010, 99:252-269.
  • 4Miller A D. A comparison in the accuracy of mapping nuclear fallout patterns using hpac, hysplit, deltic fpt and an afit fortran95 fallout deposition code[D]. Wright Patterson AFB: Air Force Institute of Technology, 2011.
  • 5Norman C D. Particle size determination from local fallout[D]. Wright Patterson AFB: Air Force Institute of Technology, 1986.
  • 6Zalewski D E. Assessment of the effects of entrainment and wind shear on nuclear cloud rise modeling[D]. Wright Patterson AFB: Air Force Institute of Technology, 2001.
  • 7Compilation of local fallout data from test detonations 1945-1962 extracted from DASA 1251. Volume I - continental U.S. tests[R]. Washington D. C.: Defense Nuclear Agency, 1979.
  • 8Bridgmen C J, Bigelow W S. A new fallout prediction model[J]. Health Physics, 1982, 43:205-218.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部