期刊文献+

基于“三矩”结构范式的本土代工企业升级能力构建 被引量:4

Local OEM/ODM Firms Upgrading Competencies Construction Based on "3-Matrixes" Structure Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文针对本土代工企业能力研究"去升级化"与"去情境化"局限,基于租金攫取视角的新升级观与网络竞合的新情境,提出升级能力概念并构建其"三矩"结构范式:升级动能矩阵、升级势能矩阵、升级效能矩阵。本土代工企业升级的枢纽,在于打破组织边界、蓄积升级动能,作为升级的源发力量和破冰之举,并驱动企业本位和网络本位两个层面、技术和营销两种形态的升级势能,以创造租金;同时,达成专有性和专用性的有效均衡,以确保升级效能、实现租金攫取。本土代工企业需要重构升级理念,按照核心技术能力提升与客户化创新的二阶进程,从知识溢出效应和租金攫取绩效两个维度,动态选择"链、网、云"等三种典型升级路径以及关键策略。促进本土代工企业升级的政策取向,需要从品牌或技术的自主创新,向升级能力螺旋武、递进性的构建转变。 For local OEM/ODMs capabilities research's limitation of non-upgrading and non-context, this paper comes up with the new concept of upgrading competency and its structure paradigm, based on the new upgrading hypotheses of rent seizing and new context of network competition-cooperation. Constructs 3 matrixes structure paradigm: upgrading kinetic energy matrix, upgrading potential energy matrix, and upgrading efficiency matrix. The local OEM/ODMs upgrading lies on constructing network learning and innovation mechanism as the starting energy of upgrading which will drive both firms level and network level, technology and marketing potential energy to create rent. With the effectively balanced ego-ownership and specificity condition, upgrading will be realized by rent seizing. Local OEM/ODMs upgrading competency construction enjoys 3 typical paths:link, network, and cloud. To foster local OEM/ODMs upgrading should shift the theory from brand or technology self dependent innovation to improving the upgrading competency.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期84-96,共13页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目"根植网络治理 升级能力建构与租金攫取绩效:本土代工企业根植升级机理研究"(批准号71273238) 国家自然科学基金面上项目"基于GVC和NVC双重嵌入的中国代工制造业升级路径研究"(批准号71173191) 浙江省软科学研究计划项目"浙江本土代工企业根植升级研究:机理 策略与政策"(批准号2012C25060)
关键词 本土代工企业 升级能力 “三矩”结构范式 网络竞合 local OEM/ODM firms upgrading competency "3-matrixes" structure paradigm network-based competition-cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. The Governance of Global Value Chains[J]. Review of International Political Economy, 2005,12(1 ).
  • 2Kaplinsky, R., J. Readman, and O. Memedovic. Upgrading Strategies in Global Furniture Value Chains[R]. Working Paper, UNIDO, 2008.
  • 3Isidoro Romero, Pilar Tejada. A Multi-level Approach to the Study of Production Chains in the Tourism Sector [J]. Tourism Management, 2011,32(2).
  • 4Dyer, Jeffrey, H., P. Kale, and H. Singh. Splitting the Pie: Rent Distribution in Alliances and Networks[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2008, (3).
  • 5Athreye, S. S. The Indian Software Industry and Its Evolving Service Capability [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005,14(2).
  • 6Scheyogg, G.,Eberl, M. How Dynamic Can Organizational Capabilities Be? Towards a Dual-Process Model of Capability Dynamization[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007,28(9).
  • 7Winter, S. G. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(10).
  • 8Wang, C. L.,Ahmed, P. K. Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agend [J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007,9 (1).
  • 9Knight, L., Pye, A. Network Learning: An Empirically Derived Model of Learning by Groups of Organizations [J]. Human Relations, 2005,58(3).
  • 10Carlo Pietrobelli, Roberta Rabellotti. Global Value Chains Meet Innovation Systems: Are There Learning Opportunities for Developing Countries[J]. World Development, 2011,39 (7).

二级参考文献42

共引文献154

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部