期刊文献+

论资源配置行政特许的私法定性 被引量:5

On the Civil Nature of Administrative licenses in Allocation of Resources
原文传递
导出
摘要 资源配置的行政特许,其本质应当属于私法上的合同关系。特许合同的私法定性,有利于化解资源配置的行政模式的缺陷,防止公权力滥用,细化公共利益。特许合同的法律构造属于继续性合同与非典型性附负担合同,其制度功能分别在于维护资源利用人的利益与公共利益。特许合同的成立方式应当优先适用招标方式,拍卖方式也仅限于修正后的方式。 The nature of administrative licenses in the allocation of resources lies in its civil nature. Acknowledging its civil nature can assist in overcoming the defects of administratively allocating resources and preventing abuses of power; it also concretizes abstract public interests. Such charter contracts are one type of continual and atypical burden-attached contracts. Administrative license's institutional function is to protect the interests of the resources beneficiary as well as public interests. Its establishment should preferably be accomplished through bidding and its sale should be done through modified auction.
作者 许军
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期105-110,共6页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 特许合同 资源配置 公共利益 public charter contracts allocation of resources public interests
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献6

  • 1胡锦光,王锴.论我国宪法中“公共利益"的界定[J].中国法学,2005(1):18-27. 被引量:191
  • 2Kelo v. City of New London,545 U. S. (2005).
  • 3Kelo v. City of New London, 843 A. 2d 500 (Conn.), cert. granted, 125 S. Ct. 27 (2004).
  • 4Richard A. Posner:The Supreme Court, 2004 Termforword: A Political Court ,119 Harv. L. Rev. 31,95(2005) .
  • 5理查德.A.波斯纳.《法律的经济分析》(上),中国大百科出版社,1997年版,页68—71.
  • 6Richard A. Posner:The Supreme Court, 2004 Termforword: A Political Court ,119 Harv. L. Rev. 31,98(2005).

共引文献60

同被引文献79

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部